Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Four paragraphs from the Guardian -- Cracks appear in coalition


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 18:42:20 -0400

The first cracks appeared in George Bush's fledgling international coalition against terrorism yesterday over the extent of military action against the prime suspect for the New York and Washington attacks, Osama bin Laden, and any countries harbouring him. Only two days after replying positively to Mr Bush's rallying call, several European countries and Russia - whose support is considered vital for any action against Bin Laden's refuge in Afghanistan - yesterday qualified their backing.

<snip>

Russia, which initially offered enthusiastic support, was adamant that it would not participate in any "revenge'' attacks. The Russian defence minister, Sergei Ivanov, said there was no chance of the US being allowed to launch attacks from the former Soviet republic, Tajikistan, to the immediate north of Afghanistan. The potential risks involved in any action against Afghanistan were underlined by the most threatening statement yet by the Taliban. In a radio address, the Taliban's spiritual leader, Mullah Mohammed Omar, warned Afghans that they faced a military strike, but called on them to stand steadfast "against the enemy". "Death comes to everyone. We must stand proud as Afghans in the defence of Islam," he said. "Believe in God, for with the grace of God the American rockets will go astray and we will be saved.

One of the reasons that several European foreign ministries are growing anxious is that the possibility is gaining credibility of a second Gulf war against Iraq to finish off the job begun in 1991 by toppling the Iraqi president, Saddam Hussein.

Paul Wofowitz, the hawkish US deputy defence secretary, hinted at such an attack by casting the challenge much wider than just taking out Bin Laden. "One has to say it's not just simply a matter of capturing people and holding them accountable, but removing the sanctuaries, removing the support systems, ending states who sponsor terrorism."

The Bush administration said it was examining the possibility of Iraqi sponsorship of Tuesday's attacks.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,1300,552410,00.html



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: