Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: House Nears Vote on Anti-Terrorism Bill


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:49:43 -0400





Envelope-to: wild () eff org
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 22:15:27 -0700
From: American Patriot Friends Network <APFN () apfn org>
Reply-To: apfn () apfn org
Organization: http://www.apfn.org/old/apfncont.htm
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: APFN Yahoogroups <apfn () yahoogroups com>
CC: Lvn4myLord () aol com, wild () eff org
Subject: House Nears Vote on Anti-Terrorism Bill


House Nears Vote on Anti-Terrorism Bill
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=10485

By JESSE J. HOLLAND
.c The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (Oct. 23)  - Police would be able to conduct secret searches of
suspects' homes, tap all their cell and home phones and track their use of
the Internet under anti-terrorism legislation moving toward final approval in
the House.

''This is going to pass by an overwhelming margin,'' said Rep. Mike Oxley,
R-Ohio. ''I think we all understand that, because the members recognize that
the committees have done their work, have made the compromises and have made
the necessary changes to get a piece of legislation that can pass.''

Lawmakers last week reached a compromise between the House and Senate
versions of President Bush's measure, which would expand the FBI's
wiretapping and electronic surveillance authority, impose stronger penalties
on those who harbor or finance terrorists and increase punishments of
terrorists.

To come to that agreement, a GOP-Democrat compromise passed unanimously by
the House Judiciary Committee was dumped by House leaders in favor of the
modified Senate version being considered.

''This legislation is not perfect, and the process is not one that all will
embrace,'' House Judiciary Chairman Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., said Tuesday.
''However, these are difficult times. ... This legislation is desperately
needed.''

Some Democrats warned the bill gives law enforcers too much power. ''This is
one of the most important measures that we will determine ... because it is
anti-terrorist legislation that expands the law in many directions,'' said
Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee.

Rep. Robert Scott, D-Va., added: ''It's not just limited to terrorism. Had it
been limited to terrorism, this bill could have passed three or four weeks
ago without much discussion.''

House leaders said the bill will be voted on Wednesday, with the Senate
expected to take up the bill later this week. The plan is to get it to Bush
for a possible Friday signing at the White House.

However, there may be a snag on the Senate side. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., has
threatened to block final approval in the Senate because of a compromise
Senate negotiators made to get House approval.

The original Senate bill tinkered with the ''McDade amendment,'' which
prevents federal prosecutors from using investigative techniques - such as
wiretaps or undercover stings - that are disallowed under ethics rules
crafted by state and local bar associations, although not barred by federal
law.

The Senate fix would loosen the McDade amendment, named for Joe McDade, a
former congressman whose reputation was clouded by an eight-year racketeering
case before he won acquittal in 1996.

Wyden wants the fix put back into the anti-terrorism bill and has threatened
to delay final approval. By Senate custom, any senator can block a bill, at
least temporarily. Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., can override the
block.

The Senate's McDade compromise wasn't the only one made during negotiations
for the anti-terrorism bill.

The Justice Department gave up on its demands that the new laws immediately
become permanent, a major loss for the Bush administration. The
administration ultimately decided that having the wiretapping and electronic
surveillance portion of the terrorism legislation expire at the end of 2005
was better than having no new laws at all.

The Republican-controlled House gave up its insistence that money-laundering
legislation be passed separately and not with the anti-terrorism legislation.

But Senate leaders repeatedly threatened to scuttle the bill if the
money-laundering provisions were taken out, and House leaders relented.

They also dumped a provision, sought by some House members, that would have
prohibited the use of credit cards or checks for illegal Internet gambling.
Law enforcement authorities have identified Internet gambling as a means for
money laundering.

In other action, the House:

-Required registration of all researchers using biological agents or toxins
and made unregistered possession a felony, regardless of intent. It would
also become a federal crime to use biological agents in a way that shows
reckless disregard for public safety.

-Passed legislation authorizing the Treasury Department to issue the first
war bonds since World War II.

-Passed legislation to make it easier for students called up to active duty
in the military to pay off their college loans.

 AP-NY-10-23-01 2127EDT
============================================================================
Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c107:2:./temp/~c107gqdzHS::

Draft Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (Sep. 19, 2001)
http://www.eff.org/sc/ashcroft_proposal.html

ALERT: "Anti-Terrorism" Surveillance Bill May Pass This Week
Act Today and Ask Your Legislators to
Vote Against Rushed, Invasive Legislation
http://www.eff.org/alerts/20011010_eff_wiretap_alert.html

Anti-terrorism bill damages liberty, foes say
http://www.security-informer.com/english/crd_about_699311.html

Contact the  House:
http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.html

Contact the Senate:
http://www.senate.gov/senators/index.cfm

The 545 People Responsible For All of America's Woes
This also includes email addresses for house and senate
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/woes.htm




For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: