Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: LA Times: The Lessons of Blowback


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 14:09:02 -0400


Sender: rberger () imap ultradevices com
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 11:01:04 -0700
From: "Robert J. Berger" <rberger () ultradevices com>

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/suncommentary/la-000078169sep30.story?coll=la%2Dheadlines%2Dsuncomment

The Lessons of Blowback
September 30, 2001

Even carefully planned actions can have unintended consequences. Let's not
do something that ultimately benefits terrorists.

By CHALMERS JOHNSON, Chalmers Johnson is author of "Revolutionary Change"
and "Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire."

SAN DIEGO -- One of the objectives of terrorism is to provoke the ruling
elites of a target regime into disastrous overreaction. When it works, as it
has in Israel over the past year, the results can be devastating for all
sides. Who does this ultimately benefit? The terrorists.

Carlos Marighella, the Brazilian guerrilla leader whose writings influenced
political terrorists in the 1960s and 1970s, explained why. If the
government can be provoked into a military response to terrorism, he wrote,
this will alienate the masses, causing them to "revolt against the army and
the police and blame them for this state of things."

The overreaction doesn't necessarily have to alienate only domestic
"masses." If we inflict great misery on innocent people in the Middle East,
there will almost certainly be what the CIA refers to as
"blowback"--unintended negative consequences of our actions. Vacillating
supporters of the terrorists might be drawn into committing terrorist acts.
Moderate governments throughout the Islamic world, especially in Saudi
Arabia and Pakistan, would almost certainly face growing internal dissent
and could even be overthrown. Perhaps the prime example of terrorism
succeeding is the Philippeville massacre of Aug. 20, 1955, in which Algerian
revolutionaries killed 123 French colonials. A conscious act of terrorism
carried out by revolutionaries who until then had enjoyed only slight
popular backing, the Philippeville massacre led to a massive and bloody
retaliation by the French. It also converted a leading French reformer
(Jacques Soustelle, then governor-general of Algeria) into an advocate of
suppression. The French crackdown eliminated most of the moderates on the
Muslim side and caused influential French citizens back home to turn against
their country's policies. This chain of events ultimately provoked a French
army mutiny, brought Gen. Charles de Gaulle back to power as the savior of
the nation and caused a French withdrawal from Algeria. Franco-Algerian
relations are still strained today.

No political cause can justify the killing on Sept. 11 of thousands of
innocent people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. But neither would
our killing innocent people in retaliation be justifiable. Terrorists attack
the vulnerable because their intended targets (the military might of a rich
country) are inaccessible. By attacking the innocent, terrorists intend to
draw attention to the sins of the invulnerable. Like the anarchism of the
19th century, terrorism is propaganda by deed.

<snip>



--
Robert J. Berger - UltraDevices, Inc.
257 Castro Street, Suite 223 Mt. View CA. 94041
Voice: 650-237-0334 VoiceMail: 408-882-4755 Fax: 408-490-2868
Email: rberger () ultradevices com  http://www.ultradevices.com



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: