Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: DIGITAL NATION L.A. Times column, 4/3/00


From: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:05:07 -0400



sent with permission of author djf

Monday, April 3, 2000

DIGITAL NATION

Foes of "New Economy" Gaining Voice

By Gary Chapman

Copyright 2000, The Los Angeles Times, All Rights Reserved

The baby boomers running and profiting from the "new economy" grew 
up in, and were shaped by, the countercultural movements of the 
1960s and '70s. Indeed, the personal computer itself was once viewed 
as a "liberation" from the boring, gray and tightly controlled kind 
of computing imposed by large corporations and their mainframes.

Several notable pioneers of the PC era started out as hippies, 
commune residents, meditation instructors and even campus radicals. 
But few if any of these now middle-aged men understand that there's 
a new culture emerging that's counter to what they've built.

The "dot-com" economy, as it rapidly matures, is setting itself up 
as a big fat target for rebellion, dissent and possibly even 
sabotage. The conditions are beginning to resemble what led to the 
blow-up of the '60s, and if this happens again, it will be, to put 
it mildly, supremely ironic.

After shamelessly absorbing the rhetorical terms "revolutionary," 
"cool," "transformational" and all the rest, the new establishment 
of the new economy may be in for a dose of the real thing.

There are tremors faintly tangible across the country these days.

Over the last few weeks, for example, the South of Market area in 
San Francisco has been plastered with signs, put up by an anonymous 
guerrilla propaganda group, that ridicule and satirize the 
neighborhood's Internet-based companies.

The "KilltheDot" campaign has created slogans that are mostly 
obscene and therefore can't be repeated here, but which skewer the 
pretensions and silliness of "dot-com" services. The signs have 
proliferated around the country through the Internet and are 
beginning to show up in other urban technology centers.

Last year, we had the images of the "Battle in Seattle," the 
protests over the World Trade Organization. Those events may be 
repeated in a few weeks in Washington, D.C., in demonstrations 
against the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. On April 
14, there will be national teach-ins on globalization in Washington, 
with scheduled protests by many of the same groups that were in 
Seattle.

In recent weeks, 1,500 people marched in protest in Boston against 
biotechnology and genetically altered foods. And 3,000 trade 
unionists marched in downtown Los Angeles for higher wages and 
better working conditions. Students at UCLA and other colleges are 
building organizations to fight sweatshops in L.A. and overseas.

"There's more and more sense from our donor constituency that money 
isn't everything, that this has gotten out of hand," says Catherine 
Suitor, director of development for the Liberty Hill Foundation in 
Santa Monica.

Liberty Hill has sponsored donor events that address such issues as 
"Raising Socially Responsible Children," and the turnout has been 
huge, Suitor says.

Most of the activism in working-class neighborhoods and on college 
campuses is about inequality. "It's more than just the new 
technology," Suitor says. "It's more about the divide created by the 
new economy." She attributed the new restlessness to "anger at 
corporate power."

Jon Katz, a media critic and author of the new book "Geeks: How Two 
Lost Boys Rode the Internet Out of Idaho" (Villard Books, 2000), 
agrees. "What you're seeing shape up is the first big political 
battle of the 21st century, between individualism and corporatism," 
Katz says.

Katz follows the growing numbers of young computer mavens who are 
loosely allied as proponents of open source software, free 
expression, an open Internet and radical individualism.

These are the young people who are increasingly challenging 
corporations that are trying to lock down the Internet and secure it 
for commerce. The mounting wars over intellectual property and 
network security are just the beginning, Katz says.

"Corporatism is a new phenomenon, and not the same as capitalism or 
corporations," he says. "It means bigness, controlling markets, mass 
marketing. Companies are now bigger than ever before. They've 
acquired most of our mainstream culture, and now they're moving on 
to the Internet.

"There's a general sense of helplessness and anger," he added. "It 
used to be you could be an individual and coexist with large 
corporations, but now you can't. It's the Wal-Marting of America."

Because of the homogenization of mass culture, Katz says, "the place 
individuals are turning to is the Internet." That's where the battle 
is being waged by young, smart, computer-savvy free-thinkers.

"These kids are the freest people on Earth. And they're mad." They 
don't want to see "their" Internet absorbed into mass market 
culture, and they don't want to see a corporate logo on every Web 
page. They're contemptuous of how conventional political parties are 
dependent on high-tech money.

The critical factor is that a lot of these young people can outwit 
the technologists of the government and private sector and build 
systems that are always one step ahead of powerful interests.

"These kids are ready to go, ready to rally around a leader," Katz 
says. "They're not going to go as easily as journalists did, when 
their media were bought up."

He predicted that soon, perhaps within a couple of years, there will 
be a political candidate who will emerge from this constituency. 
"That person will be surprised at how much anger there is out there 
about corporate power."

"When the war in Vietnam ended, the boomers gave up on revolution 
and went back to work," Katz says. In fact, they just adopted the 
terms of that era for advertising. "But these kids are real 
revolutionaries. They cannot be stopped. They're our last hope," he 
concluded

Gary Chapman is director of the 21st Century Project at the 
University of Texas at Austin. He can be reached at 
gary.chapman () mail utexas edu.


Current thread: