Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Coverage of CRA/TechNet news conference


From: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 18:45:35 -0400




Federal Funds Sought for Technology Research
Jim Puzzanghera
09/02/1999
San Jose Mercury News

WASHINGTON--As the 30th anniversary of the Internet's first heartbeat
approached, high-tech leaders and a top Clinton administration official
warned Wednesday that Congress is being dangerously shortsighted in failing
to pay for the type of federal research that helped bring the Information
Age to life.

Spending bills working their way through Congress and the Republican
majority's $792 billion tax-cut plan would sharply reduce proposed increases
on basic research in information technology at a time when a presidential
commission has declared that such funding is "seriously inadequate."

Republicans say their hands are tied by spending caps put into place by the
1997 balanced-budget agreement. But White House Chief of Staff John Podesta
said Wednesday that President Clinton's proposed budget would increase
civilian research and development money within those caps. He charged that
Republicans have chosen to reduce that research and development funding by
$1.8 billion -- or approximately 8 to 10 percent -- to help pay for other
priorities, such as the large tax cut.

"And as if this year's cuts weren't devastating enough, the Republican
budget and tax plans could reduce discretionary domestic spending by roughly
half in the coming decades, inevitably leading to even further cuts in
research and development," Podesta said in a speech at the National Press
Club. "This is a 19th-century budget for a 21st-century economy. It appears
that these Republicans grew up watching too much Fred Flintstone and not
enough Jetsons."

Podesta reiterated Clinton's determination to veto the GOP tax-cut plan and
asked that Republicans work with the administration to restore the research
and development funding.

Defenders of such high-risk, long-term research point out that today's
booming economy is being fueled in great part by one of those federally
funded projects -- the Defense Department initiative started in the 1960s to
hook up university researchers in a computer system now known as the
Internet.

"The fact is, hundreds of billions of dollars are being generated because of
that investment," said Vinton Cerf, senior vice president for Internet
architecture and technology for MCI WorldCom and one of the fathers of the
Internet. "Now is the right time to make these investments when we have the
type of surpluses we do."

Without such investments, there might be no new information-technology
advances to boost the economy 10 or 20 years from now, he said. Industry
leaders said shareholders will not allow high-tech companies to do such
long-term research, leaving the responsibility in the hands of the federal
government.

This week, high-tech industry and academic groups -- including the Palo
Alto-based lobbying group TechNet -- have written to congressional leaders
and the White House urging them to find a way to restore the
information-technology money.

"Unless immediate steps are taken to reinvigorate federal research in this
critical area, we believe there will be a significant reduction in the rate
of economic progress over the coming decades," the co-chairs of the
President's Information Technology Advisory Council wrote in a letter sent
to 84 members of Congress.

Proposals to significantly increase funding for information-technology
research have run into trouble in Congress, as have several other science
and technology proposals made by the Clinton administration, such as funding
for NASA space programs, a new generation of fuel-efficient vehicles and a
controversial public-private research partnership called the Advanced
Technology Program.

An administration proposal to spend $366 million more on
information-technology research in the coming fiscal year -- bringing the
total to $850 million -- has been cut by about $80 million so far as
Congress prepared next week to continue appropriating money for various
government agencies. And a $4.8 billion bipartisan proposal spearheaded by
the Republican chair of the House Science Committee to nearly double federal
information-technology research over the next five years has not yet come to
a vote.

Basic research money goes to universities and research institutions, helping
them attract top faculty, leading to better-educated science and engineering
students, said Ken Kennedy, a professor of computational engineering at Rice
University in Houston and a member of the President's Information Technology
Advisory Council.

"I, for one, find it astonishing at a time when information has delivered in
part ... the kind of budget surpluses we're seeing, that we're ready to
reduce the long-term investment in information technology," Kennedy said
Wednesday at a Washington news conference in which he, Cerf and others
pressed for the funding.

Eric Benhamou, chief executive officer of 3Com Corp., said the investment in
federal money the industry is seeking next year is not that much.

"Let's keep things in perspective -- $366 million is really a small amount
of money with potentially enormous returns," he said.

# # #

Tech Industry Urges Federal Funding For R&D
Mary Mosquera
09/01/1999
CMP TechWeb

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The technology industry called on Congress Wednesday to
increase funding for IT research to fuel continued economic growth.

The funding proposed in the fiscal year 2000 budget by the GOP congressional
leadership falls short of federal agency budget requests, according to the
Technology Network, an industry group, and the Computing Research
Association , an academic group.

"The federal government is important to R&D funding precisely because it is
able to make long-term investments that create new industries and improve
the quality of life," said 3Com CEO Eric Benhamou, who is also a member of
the TechNet board and a presidential commission on information technology.

The two organizations said they want Congress and President Clinton to work
together to follow funding recommendations from the President's Information
Technology Advisory Committee, an independent congressionally chartered
group of IT and research representatives. Those funding recommendations are
also embodied in legislation, the Networking and Information Technology
Research and Development Act, H.R. 2086, and in the administration's
Information Technology for the 21st Century initiative.

"Economic growth increasingly depends on the development and diffusion of
information technologies," said Edward Lazowska, chairman of the Computing
Research Association . "The prosperity we see today comes from those
investments in the past," he said The technology groups recommend $286
million for IT research in targeted agencies out of the president's total
almost $2 trillion budget for fiscal year 2000, which begins Oct. 1. But
pending congressional bills are appropriating only $80 million for IT
research at the National Science Foundation, for research in software,
networking, and high-end computing, DARPA, the defense agency researching
advanced information systems for national security, and the Energy
Department, for research in advanced computing in science.

"It's a very small amount of money, and even that small amount of money can
make a significant difference," Lazowska said, adding it ultimately creates
these technologies that change lives and heighten prosperity.

Congress returns next week from its summer recess facing budget battles to
fund the government for the next fiscal year. Additionally, Clinton has
pledged to veto a $792 billion a Republican-led tax cut, which includes a
five-year R&D tax credit for tech businesses, because it is too expensive.
The administration said it wants a smaller tax cut and extended R&D tax
credit.

The economy needs both an R&D tax credit and full funding for basic
research, said Vint Cerf, Internet pioneer and a member of the president's
IT advisory group.

"If I had to make a choice between the two, it would be a very unwise choice
because you could cripple the engine that is driving this whole information
technology explosion," Cerf said. The R&D tax credit, which expired June 30,
is one of the ways industry can capitalize on the results of its research,
he said.

# # #

White House Blasts GOP Tax-Cut Plan
That Calls for Reduction in R&D Funds
By Bob Davis
09/02/1999
The Wall Street Journal
Page B15

WASHINGTON -- The White House criticized Republican lawmakers for voting to
cut research-and-development funds, broadening its attack on the GOP tax cut
as dangerous and ill-considered.

"Their hunger for that tax cut is so strong they're willing to throw
overboard" science programs, White House Chief of Staff John Podesta said.

He mixed specific criticisms of how cutbacks in technology development could
hinder U.S. economic growth with attention-getting soundbites that are sure
to be repeated as lawmakers return to Washington next week after their
August recess.

"It appears that Republicans grew up watching too much Fred Flintstone and
not enough time watching 'The Jetsons,' " Mr. Podesta quipped.

Republicans are vulnerable politically because of cutbacks approved by
appropriators, mainly in the House. The two parties compete to be seen as
friends of R&D, both because of its futuristic image and because of
potential campaign contributions. The technology industry also can turn out
high-tech stars to press its case.

A few hours after Mr. Podesta's broadside, for instance, high-tech lobbyists
called a news conference to argue for more funding. The speakers included
Vinton Cerf, an MCI WorldCom Inc. executive who is considered one of the
inventors of the Internet, and Eric Benhamou, chief executive of 3Com Corp.,
a celebrated Silicon Valley executive.

"The health of information technology is just as important to the future as
the health of our citizens," Mr. Cerf said.

The administration and high-tech industry are particularly upset over
Republican lawmakers' failure to approve much funding for a $366 million
program to boost information technology. The program is designed to spur
research of superfast computers and wireless networks. It also is a favorite
of Vice President Al Gore, whose pet projects have been targeted for sharp
reductions by Republican lawmakers.

A spokesman for the House Science Committee's Republican majority, which has
supported the computing initiative, chalked up the actions by appropriators
to a tight budget. "They're in the process of making funding priorities," he
said.

Mr. Podesta also faulted House Republicans for approving deep cuts in the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration budget and for failing to
boost the National Science Foundation's budget by as much as the
administration sought.

The House will vote next week on the bill containing funding for the two
agencies. House appropriations subcommittee Chairman James Walsh of New York
already has said he wants to add some money back for science. Committee
Republicans approved NASA cuts of about $1 billion to pay for veteran
benefits.

# # #

CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Thursday, September 2, 1999
Technology Leaders Urge Congress to Increase Spending for Basic Research
By KELLY McCOLLUM

Washington

Information-technology experts from industry and academe pleaded Wednesday
for increased federal support for technology research, arguing that such
spending has stimulated and will continue to stimulate the U.S. economy.

The experts stated their case here at a news conference to promote spending
on a technology-research program that is known as Information Technology for
the 21st Century, or "IT2." It was proposed early this year by President
Clinton.

The President's plan calls for an additional $366-million in fiscal year
2000 to support research in computing and networking through the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Department of Energy, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Science Foundation, and
other agencies. Money provided to those agencies would make its way to
academic researchers in the form of research grants.

But because of spending caps that are intended to keep the federal budget in
balance, the increases called for in the President's plan are not included
in the current Congressional budget proposals. Of the $286-million in
increases requested by the N.S.F., DARPA, and the Department of Energy,
Congressional committees have so far approved only $70- to $80-million.

House and Senate negotiators have yet to meet to iron out differences in
their respective proposals, and speakers at the news conference clearly
hoped the legislators could be swayed to appropriate more.

The speakers outlined an assortment of arguments for increasing spending.
They credited recent economic growth in the United States largely to
high-technology industries. Those industries, in turn, benefit from
government support of basic research, with colleges and universities playing
a key role, the speakers said.

"Without sufficient funding, we will not be able to attract the faculty to
support the students who will go into these fields," said Ken Kennedy, a
professor of computer science at Rice University.

David C. Nagel, the president of AT&T Labs, said academic research is a
motivator for the technology industry. Successful companies like Yahoo! and
Excite were born through the efforts of university students, he noted,
adding that academic institutions provide the workers and knowledge needed
to fuel corporate research. "Our economic growth will suffer if we don't
have continued contact with our colleges and universities," he said.

By promoting basic, long-term, scientific research, universities and
government laboratories fill a need that cannot be replicated by private
industry, said Vinton Cerf, vice-president for Internet Architecture and
Technology at MCI WorldCom. Because shareholders are interested in
short-term gains on their investments, "corporations can't do the long-term,
high-risk investment that government has been doing in the past," said Mr.
Cerf, who helped design the basic protocols that make the Internet possible.

The conference was organized by the Technology Network, a
technology-industry lobbying group, and the Computer Research Association,
an organization of academic computer-science and computer-engineering
departments.

On 30th birthday of Internet, technology leaders push . . .

# # #
                                                  By Jim Puzzanghera
                                           INQUIRER WASHINGTON BUREAU

WASHINGTON - As the Internet's 30th birthday
approaches, high-tech leaders and a top Clinton
administration official charged yesterday that
Congress was dangerously shortsighted in failing to pay for the kind of
federal research that helped foster the information age.

Spending bills working their way through Congress and the Republican
majority's $792 billion tax-cut plan would shrink proposed increases in
funding for basic information-technology research at a time when a
presidential commission has declared that such funding already is "seriously
inadequate."

Both political parties are trolling for the financial and political support
of the high-tech community as the elections approach, and both advocate
increased government financing for technology research.

Republicans, however, say their hands are tied by
spending caps set by the 1997 balanced-budget
agreement. Advocates of greater increases in
government support for high-risk, long-term research respond that today's
booming economy is fueled largely by a federally funded project - the
Defense Department initiative begun in the 1960s to connect university
researchers in a system now known as the Internet.

"The fact is, hundreds of billions of dollars are
being generated because of that investment," said Vinton Cerf, senior vice
president for Internet architecture and technology for MCI WorldCom and one
of the fathers of the Internet. "Now is the right time to make these
investments, when we have the type of surpluses we do."

Without such investments, there might be no new
information-technology advances to boost the
economy 10 or 20 years from now, he said. Industry leaders said shareholders
would not allow high-tech companies to do such long-term research, leaving
the responsibility to the federal government.

This week, high-tech industry and academic groups
wrote congressional leaders and the White House
urging them to restore the information-technology
money.

"Unless immediate steps are taken to reinvigorate
federal research in this critical area, we believe there will be a
significant reduction in the rate of economic progress over the coming
decades," the cochairmen of the President's Information Technology Advisory
Council wrote in a letter sent to 84 members of Congress.

Proposals for significant increases in funding for information-technology
research have run into trouble in Congress. So have several other science
and technology proposals made by the Clinton administration, such as funding
for NASA space programs; new-generation, fuel-efficient vehicles; and a
controversial public-private research partnership called the Advanced
Technology Program.

But White House chief of staff John Podesta said
yesterday that President Clinton's 2000 budget
would propose increases in civilian research and
development money within the spending caps, and that Republicans had chosen
to reduce that R&D funding by $1.8 billion - about 8 to 10 percent - to help
pay for their tax cut and other priorities.

"The Republican budget and tax plans could reduce
discretionary domestic spending by roughly half in the coming decades,
inevitably leading to even further cuts in research and development,"
Podesta said in a speech at the National Press Club.

An administration proposal to spend $366 million more on
information-technology research in the
coming fiscal year - bringing the total to $850
million - has been cut by about $80 million so far. A $4.8 billion
bipartisan proposal spearheaded by the chairman of the House Science
Committee to nearly double federal information-technology research over the
next five years has not yet come to a vote.

"I for one find it astonishing at a time when
information has delivered in part . . . the kind of budget surpluses we're
seeing, that we're ready to reduce the long-term investment in information
technology," said Ken Kennedy, a professor of computational engineering at
Rice University and a member of the President's Information Technology
Advisory Council,
at a news conference here yesterday.

==========

More Govt Help Needed For Research - Tech Group
View on the web at: http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/99/135680.html

 By David McGuire Newsbytes
WASHINGTON, DC, U.S.A.,
01 Sep 1999, 3:27 PM CST

The responsibility for performing fundamental information technology
research can't be pawned off entirely on the IT industry,a cadre of
corporate and academic leaders said today. The government must play a
greater role in funding basic research efforts, they argued.

"The appropriations levels that we've seen (for IT research) are very
disappointing,"
said Ken Kennedy, a professor of Computational
Engineering at Rice University at today's event.

At the press conference - which was sponsored by the Computing Research
Association (CRA), in conjunction with high-tech lobbying
firm the Technology Network (TechNet) - executives and academics pleaded for
increased funding of the Department of Energy (DOE), Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency                   (DARPA) and National Science
Foundation (NSF).

But as Newsbytes reported Tuesday, while Republican leaders have gone to
lengths
to paint the GOP as the technology-friendly party in Washington,
congressional Republicans appear in no rush to bolster the funding levels
for high-tech-oriented government agencies.

"There is a place for government funding of fundamental research, but we
think the private sector is ultimately the best place for that kind
of research to occur," House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas,
spokesperson Richard Diamond said
Tuesday.

Speakers at today's event argued that corporate-funded research is, by
necessity,                  focused on short-term developments and
innovations, and unlikely to generate the
kind of major advances critical to supporting the
nation's technology-reliant economy.

"Companies do R&D (research and development), but they do a lot more 'D'
than they do 'R,'" said Vinton Cerf, senior vice president for Internet
architecture and technology at MCI WorldCom, at today's meeting.

3Com Corp Chairman and CEO Eric A. Benhamou agreed with Cerf's assessment.
Only about 1-2 percent of 3Com's total research budget goes toward
long-term, fundamental research, he said.

CRA and TechNet are recommending that Congress support the recommendations
of the President's Information Technology Advisory Committee
(PITAC) by boosting the funding levels of six high-tech oriented agencies by
$1.4
billion over the next five years.

Recent Senate and House appropriations bills have borne bad tidings for
three of the agencies included in PITAC's recommendations.

The DOE - which purports to be the nation's largest supporter of basic and
applied research - requested $70 million over its current research funding -
got $0 in additional appropriation in bills from both houses of Congress.

DARPA, which requested $70 million for IT research, got appropriations of
$45 million
and $30 million from the Senate and House, respectively. And the NSF, which
played
a central role in the development of the Internet, requested more than $140
million for
research activities, and received a House appropriation of $35 million.

The Senate has not yet completed its NSF appropriation recommendations.

In a related development today White House Chief of Staff John Podesta said
the Republican-sponsored tax cut would "make deep cuts" in US
civilian research and development efforts, which would "guarantee that
federal funding of R&D is slashed in the future," (see related Newsbytes
article).

Reported by Newsbytes.com, http://www.newsbytes.com .

# # #


Current thread: