Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: A press release on ACM's UCITA letter


From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:46:32 -0400




Press Contacts:
Anne Wilson, ACM
212-626-0505
annewilson () acm org

Christopher Morgan, ACM
617-262-2044
morgan () acm org

ACM SAYS THE SOFTWARE CONSUMER WOULD LOSE IMPORTANT RIGHTS IF THE UNIFORM
COMPUTER TRANSACTIONS ACT (UCITA) BECOMES LAW

UCITA could discourage the development of reliable software and restrict the
consumer's right to pursue remedies for software problems, says ACM

New York, July 15, 1999 -- The Association for Computing Machinery has voiced
its support for the software consumer by opposing the proposed Uniform Computer
Information Transactions Act (UCITA), to be considered for endorsement later
this month by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
The ACM noted that the software consumer would stand to lose important rights
if the proposal becomes law. The ACM is the nation's oldest association of
computing professionals, with over 80,000 members in industry, academia, and
government.

UCITA is a proposed licensing law that would, among other things, redefine the
legal standards for software mass market licenses, including the shrinkwrap
licenses familiar to computer software users. If endorsed by the Commissioners,
the UCITA proposal would then be introduced into the individual state
legislatures for voting.

ACM President Barbara Simons said today, "We oppose the Uniform Computer
Information Transactions Act, and are making our announcement now because the
state Commissioners may decide to endorse UCITA within the next two weeks. The
ACM has had a long-standing interest in ensuring the development of computer
products and services that are well designed and that do not endanger public
safety. Legal rules must not discourage the creation of reliable software or
make it more difficult to detect and correct software problems."

Cem Kaner, a Silicon-valley based attorney and software development consultant,
added his voice to the ACM's anti-UCITA stance, saying, "If UCITA becomes law,
software publishers would have no duty to check their products for viruses.
Furthermore, vendors could avoid paying for damage caused by a virus, and
software users would have a harder time returning a defective product." Kaner
is a member of the ACM's U.S. Public Policy Committee.

Liability issues

In a letter to the Commissioners, Simons noted that UCITA appears to put user
interface errors in the same category as errors in a newspaper article, thus
making it too easy for software publishers to avoid facing any legal
consequences for defective software.  Pamela Samuelson, software legal expert
and member of the ACM's U.S. Public Policy Committee, agreed, saying "UCITA
presumes that a software program's user interface -- the part visible to the
user -- is technically not part of the program. That means warranty liability
rules would not apply to the user interface. If this is the case, software
developers will no longer be held to a high standard, and bad user interface
designs will predominate."

Threats to Reverse Engineering

The ACM letter stresses that UCITA could also threaten normal engineering
activities, especially reverse engineering, by allowing publishers to ban the
technique through contractual use restrictions. Reverse engineering is a
commonly used technique in the software industry and in academia. It involves
studying a software program without having access to its source code so as to
understand its operation. Computer software expert and ACM U.S. Public Policy
Committee member Eugene Spafford warns "Reverse engineering is a time-honored,
legal procedure that allows consumers and technologists to examine software for
security defects, fix dangerous flaws, and develop interoperability with other
software. UCITA would allow vendors to prohibit or severely restrict these
activities, thus increasing the risks to the public from buggy software,
computer viruses, and other all-too-common software problems."

The full text of the ACM letter to the Commissioners on Uniform State Laws is
available at http://www.acm.org/usacm/copyright/

###


Current thread: