Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: When Will We Have to Opt Out Daily?


From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 14:50:03 -0500




Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 14:35:18 -0500
To: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
From: "Lance J. Hoffman" <hoffman () seas gwu edu>
Subject: When Will We Have to Opt Out Daily?

Dave,
The story below depicts, pretty accurately, a time-based privacy breach by
AOL (who should know better).  I checked it out with someone in a position
at AOL, and the story is essentially accurate.  It appears that with AOL,
"no" does not mean "no" (and they even tell you that in the fine print).
It's a pretty outrageous practice that brings the bad old practices of the
pre-Internet age to today.  IP-ers might be intersted in it.

Lance


AOL To Users: Opt Out Again
By Doug Brown, >By Doug Brown, Inter@ctive Week
November 29, 1999 9:28 AM ET

An America Online policy is again putting privacy issues on the front
burner. The nation's leading access provider recently started sending
e-mails to customers informing them that the privacy preferences they signed
up for a year ago - the ones telling the company not to collect or
distribute information about their accounts or online habits - have
"expired."

AOL said that if subscribers want their preferences to remain in place, they
must again fill out what is known as an "opt out" form. If they do nothing,
information about their accounts and Web habits may be distributed to
marketers and other interested parties.

The preferences' one-year life span is part of a much-publicized privacy
policy that AOL put in place a year ago, said Andrew Weinstein, a spokesman
at AOL. He defended the policy, saying that the company explained "to
consumers in detail exactly how [the preferences] will work. They work on a
one-year basis. If they want to receive materials after that, they are given
the ability to do that."

But privacy advocates evaluate the new policy differently. They said most
AOL users are surprised to learn they have to redo their opt-out
preferences.

David Sobel, general counsel at privacy advocacy group Electronic Privacy
Information Cente, said AOL's new approach to privacy is appalling, but not
surprising. It also could mark a step backward for the industry's attempts
to anoint "opting out" the only privacy solution in the online world.

"I think that if we get to the point of having a serious congressional
examination of this issue, it will be shown that 'opt out' is not adequate,"
Sobel said. "I would show as exhibit 'A' the kind of thing that AOL is
sending out. Not only will they bother you once, but it will become a
constant job to keep saying 'no.' "

Sobel favors legislation to deal with the collection and sale of personal
online information. Industry, on the other hand, promotes self-regulation as
the only way to protect privacy without setting up e-commerce roadblocks.

For consumers, opting out means, generally, filling out a form - either
online or on paper - stating an unwillingness to have personal information
distributed. Users can opt out of lists used for sending spam e-mail, having
logs of their online travels sold to marketers or having information about
what they buy online disseminated.

The concept has gathered momentum in Washington, D.C. The Federal Trade
Commission recently sponsored a daylong conference that explored the
practice of harvesting and selling data about users' online habits and ways
to deal with it, including opting out. There are also several House bills
pushing opting out as a way to help ensure consumer privacy.

But privacy advocates generally oppose opting out, saying the practice is a
smokescreen for businesses more than anything else. Consumers must remain
constantly vigilant to keep their online activities out of the marketing
loop when the burden, they argue, should instead be placed upon industry.

"You're in the world, not your living room," said Sydney Rubin, a
spokeswoman at the Online Privacy Alliance, an industry coalition that
promotes privacy standards from an industry perspective. "You have to read
the privacy policies and then choose whether or not to shop at a site."




Lance J. Hoffman, Director, Cyberspace Policy Institute
and Professor, Dept. of Computer Science, The George Washington University,
Washington DC 20052.  Phone (202) 994-5513 Fax (202) 994-5505.
http://www.seas.gwu.edu/seas/institutes/cpi/


Current thread: