Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Some more on Registered Trademark
From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 15:01:56 -0500
From: "Larry Andrew" <LLAndrew () powersurge net> To: <johnmac () acm org> Cc: <farber () cis upenn edu>, <declan () well com>, <connie () lsoft com> John, I saw your comment about the "listserv" trademark in the IP list and sent my comment to Connie Newman. Her response is below. I examined the web sight, understand her argument, and find it lacking. I do not consider it responsible use of the trademark function as L-soft should have registered the word years earlier if they had planned on doing so. Unfortunately, even though something may be legal, it is not necessarily right, correct, moral, or ethical. Look at what is happening in the impeachment hearings these days. (I am NOT expressing my personal beliefs at this point, either way.) Ever hear the quote about "...then the law is an ass"? Unfortunately, the ones who sort all this out in our society are the <shudder> lawyers! Anyway, good luck with your LISTSERV (R) articles. Larry Andrew Assistant Professor of MIS Division of Business Upper Iowa University AndrewL () uiu edu LLAndrew () powersurge net -----Original Message----- From: Connie Newman <connie () lsoft com> To: Larry Andrew <LLAndrew () powersurge net> Date: Friday, December 11, 1998 9:12 AM Subject: Re: Fw: Registered Trademark If you would like to educate yourself as to how LISTSERV (R) became our trademark, please feel free to view our company's history at: http://www.lsoft.com/listserv-hist.stm Thank you and best regards, Connie Newman L-Soft
Re: LISTSERV trademark (IP distribution below) Dear Ms. Newman, As an information systems professional and college professor of Management Information Systems, I am greatly offended that your firm would take action to trademark the term "listserv". This term has been used generically in the industry for years and your trademark registration of 1996, while perhaps legal, goes beyond good taste and propriety. You should in all good conscience reconsider your action and release the trademark, and even consider an open appology to the I.S. community at large. Be assured that I will advise my clients to avoid the use of products and services associated with the name L-Soft. Lawrence L. Andrew LLAndrew () powersurge net AndrewL () uiu edu ================================================== -----Original Message----- From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu> To: ip-sub-1 () majordomo pobox com <ip-sub-1 () majordomo pobox com> Date: Thursday, December 10, 1998 4:21 PM Subject: IP: Registered TrademarkFrom: "John F. McMullen" <johnmac () acm org> To: "Dave Farber" <farber () cis upenn edu>, "Declan McCullagh"<farber () cis upenn edu>After writing a column for the Westchester Business Journal that contained the term "listserv", a term that I have used since 1989 in articles,columnsand in teaching at college and university level, I received the enclosed message from Connie Newman at L-Soft, chastizing me for using a Registered TradeMark of her firm. After breiefly discussing the letter with DaveFaber,I replied to Connie asking when L-Soft had filed the trademark. She responded "The trademark is U.S. Reg. #2,001,258 for LISTSERV registered September 17, 1996.". While L-Soft may have acted within the framework of the law, I find this situation intellectually insulting - like me attempting to register"telnet"or "ftp" as registered trademarks of McMullen & McMullen, Inc. I did a quick check through books in the extensive McMullen library. "The Internet Unleashed", Sams, 1994 states "Listservs are one of the most accessible Internet resources .." (p 320) and then goes on for 46 pages describing the use. Esther Dyson on page 44 of Release 2.1 uses the term. "The Internet for Dummies Quick Reference" defines Listserv as "a family of programs that automatically manages mailing lists .. " .. and I have foundanumber of other references - all but the first since 1996 - and none refer to it as a Registered TradeMark. What about e-mail addresses like listserv () american edu? Is that aviolation?I may be making too much of this but I find it galling. This is not a case of an uninformed public using a term like "Xerox" or "Coke" incorrectly. This is an outfit that had to know better grabbing a generic term andmakingit a brand name (In fact, one of the books that I came across refers to it as a "generic term"). As far as I'm concerned, this is intellectually dishonest. Please distribute this for comments to johnmac () acm org or on Dave Faber's list. I would hope that Jamie Love would be interested in something like this as well as our various net attorneys. I will write about it - butwouldlike to see some outrage and, perhaps, action -----Original Message----- From: Connie Newman [mailto:connie () lsoft com] Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 1998 4:21 PM To: johnmac () acm org Subject: Registered Trademark It has come to our attention that you are using the term LISTSERV (r) to describe electronic mail distribution lists in your article, "Spam andotherelectronic annoyances" Unfortunately, that term is a registered trademark. It is a common mistake to use LISTSERV (r) as a generic term. It would be helpful if you would replace it in the future with another phrase, such as "mailing list" or "announcement service". We apologize if this causes any inconvenience. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Please contact me with any concerns or questions. Sincerely, Connie Newman ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Connie Newman <connie () lsoft com> L-Soft international, Inc. http://www.lsoft.com "When you come to the fork in the road, take it" - L.P. Berra John F. McMullen johnmac () acm org ICQ: 4368412 http://www.westnet.com/~observer http://www.westnet.com/~observer/Y2KCOACH.html (Y2K Site)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Connie Newman <connie () lsoft com> L-Soft international, Inc. http://www.lsoft.com
Current thread:
- IP: Some more on Registered Trademark Dave Farber (Dec 12)