Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: CATO Paper on Revisionists
From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 14:46:21 -0500
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 14:29:15 -0400 From: "McCullough, Matthew" <MMcCullough () willkie com> Below is the executive summary from a CATO paper released today evaluating the revisionists' prespective and policy prescriptions during the late 80's and early 90's. I am told the full text of the paper can be found at CATO's Center for Trade Policy Studies' web site -- www.freetrade.org. For those, like myself, who tend to agree with the CATO analysis, enjoy. For the rest of you.....I am sure the mud pies are already being prepared. I look forward to your reactions. Matt McCullough ------------------------------------------------------------ Executive Summary After the collapse of Soviet-style communism, the "Japan, Inc." economic model stood as the world's only real alternative to Western free-market capitalism. Its leading American supporters who became known as "revisionists" argued in the late 1980s and early 1990s that the United States could not compete with Japan's unique form of state-directed insider capitalism. Unless Washington adopted Japanese-style policies and abandoned free markets in favor of "managed trade," they said, America would become an economic colony of Japan. Today, the verdict is in: the revisionists were dead wrong, both in their assessment of the Japanese "threat" and in their recommendations for U.S. policy. Japan has not attained worldwide dominance; on the contrary, it has suffered a "lost decade" of economic stagnation. The "Japan, Inc." model has not eclipsed Western-style capitalism; instead, there is an emerging consensus on both sides of the Pacific that the Japanese model has failed. Countries up and down the Pacific Rim are embracing market-oriented reforms in the wake of an economic crisis blamed widely on Japanese-style "crony capitalism." Meanwhile, the United States, far from declining, is enjoying record-setting prosperity because it largely ignored the revisionists' advice. Japan's problems are now obvious. To revive its fortunes, it must move to a system under which capital is allocated, not according to established relationships or government policy, but in response to clear and undistorted market signals. In sum, Japan needs to abandon the very elements of its system that the revisionists singled out as its greatest strengths. The revisionists' big mistake was to believe that a handful of government planners could outthink millions of private decisionmakers-could pick "strategic" industries, allocate capital in defiance of market signals, and prop up the stock market and real estate values. Only a few short years were needed to burst their bubble.
Current thread:
- IP: CATO Paper on Revisionists Dave Farber (Jul 31)