Interesting People mailing list archives
ip: Re: EFF Position Statement on Internet Domain Name System
From: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 18:55:48 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 23:37:35 -0400 To: farber () cis upenn edu From: "Richard J. Solomon" <rjs () rpcp mit edu> Subject: Re: ip: EFF Position Statement on Internet Domain Name System Cc: ip-sub-1 () majordomo pobox com Amazing how history is repeating itself. This is the 2d or 3d time, depending how you count, that limited vision in telecom could not deal with chaos. In the past, governments took complete control of things like spectrum because unimaginative private entities became too greedy, too fast. Indeed, the same thing happened to the railroads 100 years ago because of chaos in ratemaking &etc. (See our book, Gordian Knot for documentation.) One huge flaw in everyone's viewpoint re: the DNS issues is the assumption that the parallel evolution of the "telephone" network (e.g., numbering system, routing tables, bandwidth selection, tariffs, OA&M, etc.) has nothing to do with the future of the Internet. An analogy might be made with the separation of wireless and wireline regulatory issues when spectrum was forced to fall under government control worldwide some 60-70 years ago, stifling coherent convergence for two generations. I don't hold much hope for the current negotiations. No matter what happens, we'll be at it again in full force in just a few years as the Net matures and merges into basic telecom infrastructure. Do we end up with monopoly once again because of the perpetual tragedies of the commons? Richard
Current thread:
- ip: Re: EFF Position Statement on Internet Domain Name System David Farber (May 01)