Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: US Major Science Bill
From: David Farber <farber () central cis upenn edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 19:51:03 -0400
FYI The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Science Policy News Number 137: October 4, 1995 House Set to Consider Science Authorization Legislation The House of Representatives is scheduled to consider a massive science authorization bill on October 11-13. While it is uncertain what will ultimately become of this legislation, it is notable on several counts, not the least of which is in its efforts to broadly set science policy and funding priorities. H.R. 2405, the Omnibus Civilian Science Authorization Act of 1995, was introduced by House Science Committee Chairman Robert Walker (R-PA) on September 27. Joining Walker in cosponsoring the bill are his four subcommittee chairs: Constance Morella (R-MD), Steven Schiff (R-NM), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), and James Sensenbrenner (R-WI). The bill is a combination of seven authorization bills which the committee has previously considered, setting forth the funding limits and program direction for some or all of the programs of NSF, NASA, DOE, NIST, NOAA, EPA, and the U.S. Fire Administration. A committee release states that H.R. 2405 authorizes "the legitimate core functions of the federal civilian science establishment." This bill attempts to codify, to some extent, science policy and funding priorities for these seven agencies and departments. H.R. 2405 serves as an important indicator of where science policy is heading in the next few years. The committee release provides three major reasons why these seven authorization bills have been bundled into one bill. The first reason is "To make the point that science is a national issue deserving of major national attention." Walker comments: "With H.R. 2405, we are attempting to elevate science to the same kind of consideration that our defense priorities have always had." The second reason is, according to the release, "To consider civilian science R&D as a whole, in order to better set priorities." The final reason is "To make it clear that science is vital to our long-term economic interests." Walker added, "Civilian science R&D is a multi-billion dollar decision with the potential to have a large impact on our nation's economy. This approach allows us to consider multi-faceted aspects of science in a way that enhances their over-all impact." H.R. 2405 authorizes $21.5 billion in total spending for FY 1996 for the seven areas covered under the bill (authorization legislation only gives permission to spend; appropriations bills provide the actual money.) This is $3.0 billion, or 12.2%, less than spending for the same programs in FY 1995. President Clinton requested $25.1 billion for these programs in FY 1996. "Nevertheless," the release states, "funding of basic research increases from $6.67 billion to $6.74 billion", or 1.0%. (Note that this $6.74 billion is 31.3% of the $21.5 billion total.) While various appropriations bills eclipse H.R. 2405, this legislation gives added weight to Republican efforts to shape federal science policy and funding. Future issues of FYI will summarize some of the important features of this legislation affecting the Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, NASA, and the Department of Commerce. ############### Richard M. Jones Public Information Division American Institute of Physics fyi () aip org (301) 209-3095 ##END##########
Current thread:
- IP: US Major Science Bill David Farber (Oct 04)