Interesting People mailing list archives
project summary - Global Think Tank Network from Japan
From: David Farber <farber () central cis upenn edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 06:30:32 -0500
From: ajp () glocom ac jp Posted-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 00:44:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 14:46:14 -0800 To: farber () central cis upenn edu Subject: project summary - Global Think Tank Network Dave, if you think it might be of interest, please feel free to distribute the following report on your IP list. Thanks to you and those IP'ers who helped with the project. If anyone would like more information (the full the report, in Japanese, should be available soon) they should contact me by e-mail: ajp () glocom ac jp Thanks, Adam ++++++++++++++ English Summary NIRA Research The Global Think Tank Network: Promoting Greater Exchange Between International Policy Research Centers Preface The purpose of this project is to further the establishment of a "Global Think Tank Network" by studying current networking trends, elucidating the basic framework, hardware, operations, and software for the system, and issuing recommendations on how the system should be created. Since the eighties, "imbalance" has emerged as a major issue between Japan and the United States, or more broadly, between Japan and the rest of the international community. This has taken the form of trade imbalances, arguments of "free-riding" on defense, and complaints about unequal contributions to the international community. But there is actually a more fundamental problem at work. What is at the heart of the often rancorous friction between Japan and the international community is an _information imbalance_. One of the conclusions of our research is that better "databases" are not, by themselves, a sufficient remedy for the information imbalance. Rather, what is needed is a "Network Solution" that will provide a more immediate (real-time) infrastructure accessible by wider segments of societies. The best tool for creating this platform will be the highly decentralized environment provided by the Internet. In this report, we provide the theoretical underpinning for this conclusion as well as empirical evidence from surveys of potential users. The Global Communication Center, which headed up this project, made extensive use of the Internet in its research. During the process of completing its feasibility study on the creation of a global think tank network, the center was able to build cooperative ties with many organizations. Obviously, such cooperation between research institutes, organizations, and related institutions will be vital to the creation of the kind of platform for international exchange that we envision. Many different facets of the new computerization paradigm will be emerging in the future, among them networking, multimedia, and the integration of broadcasting and telecommunications. Ultimately, however, it will be innovations in the realm of digital communications technology that will be the driving force behinds these developments. How this point is understood and interpreted will have a decisive impact on the way in which the Global Think Tank Network is put together. We gained valuable insights for this research from our study on the new information policies advocated by the Clinton administration in the United States. The most important insight of all is how laggard Japan has been in this area. This finding reinforces from a slightly different angle the urgency of the need for Japan to create a forum for the international exchange of information that is accessible from wider segments of societies--the kind of forum envisioned by the Global Think Tank Network. In the United States, the Clinton administration has taken the lead in formulating a plan to create a "National Information Infrastructure" that will link not only institutions of higher learning, but schools, libraries, hospitals, companies, government agencies, and all of the personal computers and work stations in the hands of the general population. Naturally, the Internet will serve as the core of the NII. As the world's first autonomous global computer network, the Internet is also in many ways an example of "international public goods." The number of organizations in the network is growing sharply. Internet and mechanisms for international information exchange. One of the social roles of think tanks is to serve as the forum for information exchange in the international community, a purpose for which Japanese think tanks are not sufficiently developed. It will be important to utilize their storage of efforts and to ensure that their information is publicly accessible and searchable from both inside and outside of Japan, while also encouraging domestic think tanks to "network". There is an urgent need for Japan's think tanks to be able to maximize their limited human and material resources. The institutions that lead this effort will need to serve as a "connection point" that provides a two-way flow of information into and out of Japan. In other words, when accessed from overseas they should provide profiles of Japan's think tanks and information on the activities they are involved in, and when requested by users in Japan they should seek information disclosures from foreign think tanks. The flow of information will begin at many different levels--think tank profiles, research topics, publication exchanges, discussions among researchers -- and can be expected to develop into full-fledged exchanges of more substantial information and research coordination in the future. Presently, useful social information is scattered among a wide range of universities, government agencies, and private-sector institutions. In addition, researchers in Japan and other countries seek information on a broad spectrum of subjects, including, for example, information on the policies of public institutions (official development assistance, etc.), information that will require more "transparency" on the part of the government (Japanese defense policy or use of nuclear materials, etc.), technical information in a wide variety of disciplines, and more grass- roots, community-level information. We should further note that these are times of sweeping change, and the speed with which social information appears on the network is therefore also of the essence. The information in this kind of decentralized environment is not standardized, so it will not be efficient to accumulate it in traditional "star-style" databases. Rather, to get effective use out of it, think tanks will need to participate in a "rhizome-style" network. [diagram deleted] The traditional star-style database [diagram deleted] Rhizome-style networks such as the Internet The Internet is the embodiment of the rhizome-style network. Researchers on the network are able to exchange electronic mail, distribute articles and working papers, and use "ultra-wide-area" searching systems. For example, articles and documents are exchanged via a function known as "ftp" or "file transfer protocol," and there are already many services that have coupled ftp with wide-area information searching functions covering a large number of sites. One such example is the Internet service provided by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The service began in July 1993, and according to the manager of the UNDP Gopher site, was accessed an average 750 times a day during October of that year. During a sample week of that month, users from 31 different countries accessed the service and retrieved over 900 files. Obviously, UN agencies have an advantage over regular think tanks when it comes to attracting users, but the numbers nevertheless underscore how actively used Internet sites are. Results of Survey We conducted a two-part survey to discover the extent to which the world's major think tanks made use of computer networks, their intentions for utilizing networks in the future, their interest in and expectations for a network linking think tanks together, and their use of and desire for information concerning Japan. Below is a brief summary and analysis of those results. ** Use of electronic mail In North America, over 65% of our respondents used electronic mail, compared with 50% in Europe, 38% in Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa, and 33% in Asia. Note the relative enthusiasm of developing countries for networking. ** Greater-than-expected Internet utilization Some 31% of the institutions responding that they are utilizing electronic mail are users of the Internet, which is at about 10% of the original population. It is generally held that researchers in the humanities and social sciences only recently began to use the Internet, so this shows spread farther than we had expected. ** Enthusiastic about think tank network In the second part of our survey, we asked respondents to assume that it was possible to create a global network that would link up think tanks, and then tried to measure their interest and enthusiasm for participating in such a network. Some 84% said they would be interested in using the network for information exchange and discussion, and when the "probably interested" responses are factored in, the number rises to nearly 90%. This indicates an extremely high degree of enthusiasm for the project. Institutions were also positive about providing their own information. Some 80% said yes, they would definitely like to, and another 7% said they probably would like to, for a total of 87% positive response. This is a major discovery in that it highlights the need not just for information gathering and utilization, but for a vehicle over which to publish one's own information as well. ** Growing need for "gray literature" and databases about Japan At the moment, "statistical materials" are the most heavily used information on Japan, followed by "government documents and publications," "conference proceedings," "research papers (monographs)," "newspapers and magazines," "newsletters," "specialist journals," "working papers," and "reports on specialist studies." The information researchers would most likely access to in the future is, in order, "conference proceedings," "reports on specialist studies," "working papers," "specialist journals," and "monographs." This indicates present high demand for "gray literature"--documents and information not generally published to the outside world or if published, not easily accessible. By contrast, use of "foreign on-line databases," "mailing lists," and "Internet search tools" is low, and this is especially the case for "Japanese on-line databases." There is, however, a high level of interest in using "Japanese on-line databases" in the future, as well as (in order) "library and reference services" and "Internet search tools." It is worth noting that these network-style utilization methods, including such things as "Internet newsgroups" rank right near the top. ** Think tank network highly feasible The survey underscores the relatively widespread use of computer networks, primarily the Internet, among think tanks, which validates our prediction of the high potential for contribution to the international development of research activities through a network that links up think tanks. Interest is particularly high in the active transmission and provision of information rather than in one-way information reception, and this enthusiasm makes it extremely likely that we will be able to attract the cooperation needed to realize the Global Think Tank Network concept. Our conclusion, based on the results of this survey, is that the world's think tanks are gradually developing a common understanding of the effectiveness of networks in information exchange in social science research. However, the conditions have not yet been met for think tanks and researchers to overcome organizational, geographical, and linguistic constraints and actually use computer networks. What is needed to close this gap between potential and reality is for some organization to take the initiative showing the research institutes of the domestic/international community the potential that networked information exchange has. Were a non-profit private-sector research institute to serve as the catalyst in the creation and spread of a network to link think tanks from around the world, it would be a valuable contribution to the research activities of the world's think tanks, and also play a significance role in reducing the information imbalance. that exists between Japan and the international community. In closing we would like to offer some suggestions and perspectives regarding the creation and operation of a Global Think Tank Network. ** Phased-In Project Important If the Global Think Tank Network is to be successful, it will need to proceed step-by-step. Keep the following principles in mind: 1) Experiment first Building a full-fledged think tank network right from the beginning carries enormous risks. A trial period will be needed to test and verify the technology and content of the network, with the full network being built in phases. There are few companies providing the know-how that research institutes in the social sciences need to connect to the Internet (work stations, Local Area Networks, leased optical fiber lines, etc.) in many societies. Even when the link is made, it is no easy job to find useful files and organize a usable researchers' network from the massive information environment (basically all in English) provided by the Internet. It will be necessary to develop expertise with both the hardware and with how the network is run, and that knowledge will have to be shared by all users. 2) Limit the subject matter and type of information provided, collaborate wherever possible It is inefficient to maintain a comprehensive collection of information. Divisions of labor are more effective and must be pursued wherever possible. The basic core of information can be provided from a relatively small database, with other institutions adding further information. 3) Provide information on the basis of "need" rather than "availability" 4) Encourage interaction between users Few people will use networks if all they provide is information. The project will move faster if human interaction is encouraged. This should be a "participatory" project, and one way to make it so would be to create a mailing list to discuss the project open to all interested. Yasuhide Yamanouchi (yama () glocom ac jp) Izumi Aizu (izumi () glocom ac jp) Adam Peake (ajp () glocom ac jp) International University of Japan Center for Global Communications
Current thread:
- project summary - Global Think Tank Network from Japan David Farber (Mar 15)