Interesting People mailing list archives
Rec to the EU Council Europe and the GII -- sorry for the format but ..
From: David Farber <farber () linc cis upenn edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 1994 17:26:28 -0400
transport industry and unions byend 1994. Definition of standards for communication procedures and the exchange of data and voice messages between ATC-centres as well as between ATC-centres and aeroplanes. A functioning trans-European system before the year 2000. Application Seven HEALTHCARE NETWORKS Less costly and more effective healthcare systems for Europe's citizens What should be done? Create a direct communication "network of networks" based on common standards linking general practitioners, hospitals and social centres on a European scale. Who will do it? The private sector, insurance companies, medical associations and Member State healthcare systems, with the European Union promoting standards and portable applications. Once telecom operators make available the required networks at reduced rates, the private sector will create competitively priced services at a European level, boosting the productivity and cost-effectiveness of the whole healthcare sector. Who gains? Citizens as patients will benefit from a substantial improvement in healthcare (improvement in diagnosis through on-line access to European specialists, on-line reservation of analysis and hospital services by practitioners extended on European scale, transplant matching, etc.). Tax payers and public administrations will benefit from tighter cost control and cost savings in healthcare spending and a speeding up of reimbursement procedures. Issues to watch? Privacy and the confidentiality of medical records will need to be safeguarded. What target? Major private sector health care providers linked on a European scale. First level implementation of networks in Member States linking general practitioners, specialists and hospitals at a regional and national level by end 1995. Application Eight ELECTRONIC TENDERING More effective administration at lower cost What should be done? Introduction of electronic procedures for public procurement between public administrations and suppliers in Europe followed by the creation of a European Electronic Tendering Network. This programme will function as a strong enabling mechanism for attaining critical mass in the telematic services market in Europe. Who will do it? European Council and Member States decide to agree on common standards and to introduce a mandatory commitment to electronic handling of information, bidding and payments related to public procurement. Telecom operators and service providers will enableusers to access to the European Electronic Tendering Network. Who gains? PublicAdministrations will benefit from cost savings in replacing paper handling with electronic handling and from the more competitive environment between suppliers drawn from the wider internal market. Small and medium sized enterprises will benefit from participating in trans-European public procurement and from the diffusion of telematic services. Issues to watch? Data security, the need to ensure open access particularly for SMEs, to avoid electronic procurement developing into a hidden form of protectionism. Take proper account of similar programmes developed in third countries, particularly the US (CALS). What target? A critical mass of 10% of awarding authorities using electronic procedures for their procurement needs could be attained in the next two to three years. Application Nine TRANS-EUROPEAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NETWORK Better government, cheaper government What should be done? Interconnected networks between Public Administrations networks in Europe, aiming at providing an effective and less expensive (replacement of paper by electronic means) information interchange. Subsequently extended to link public administrations and European citizens. Who will do it? European Union and Member States should strengthen and speed up the implementation of the programme for Interchange of Data between Administrations (IDA). The private sector will increase its co-operation with the European Union and Member States in defining technical solutions for the provision of interoperable services and interconnectable networks, while supporting national and local authorities in the testing and implementation of networks and services for citizens. Who gains? The unification process for the single market, with general benefits in lower costs and better relations between public administrations and European citizens. What target? Implementation of interconnected networks allowing interchange in the tax, customs and excise, statistical, social security, health care domains, etc., by 1995-96. Application Ten CITY INFORMATION HIGHWAYS Bringing the information society into the home What should be done? Set up networks providing households with a network access system and the means of using on-line multimedia and entertainment services on a local, regional, and national and international basis. Who will do it? Groups of content and service providers (broadcasters, publishers), network operators (telecoms organisations, cable), system suppliers/integrators (e.g. consumer electronic industry). Local and regional authorities, citizens groups, chambers of commerce and industry, will have very important roles to play. Who gains? Consumers will enjoy early experience of complex new services, particulary multimedia services, and will be able to express their preferences in the fields of entertainment (video on demand), transaction-oriented services (banking, home shopping etc.) as well as gaining access to information services and teleworking or telelearning. Public authorities will gain experience with issues such as privacy, IPR protection, standardisation which will be helpful in defining a single legal and regulatory environment. Private sector participants will gain early hands-on experience of consumer preferences for programmes, software and services. User interfaces can be tested and improved in practice. What target? Install and operate in up to five European cities with up to 40,000 households per city by 1997. _________________________________________________________________ CHAPTER 5 FINANCING THE INFORMATION SOCIETY - A TASK FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR It is neither possible nor necessary at this stage to be precise about the amount of investment that will be generated by the development of the information infrastructure and related services and applications. Analyses made of the US market remain highly questionable, although there is no doubt that the total investment required over the next 5 to 10 years will be considerable. The Group believes the creation of the information society in Europe should be entrusted to the private sector and to market forces. The Group believes the creation of the information society in Europe should be entrusted to the private sector and to market forces. Private capital will be available to fund new telecoms services and infrastructures providing that the different elements of this Report's Action Plan are implemented so that: * market liberalisation is fast and credible * rules for interoperability and reciprocal access are set * tariffs are adjusted * the regulatory framework is established There will be no need for public subsidies, because sufficient confidence will have been established to attract the required investment from private sources. Ultimately, it is market growth that is perceived as the real guarantee for private investors, rendering subsidies and monopolies superfluous. Public investment will assume a role, but not by any increase in the general level of public spending - rather by a refocusing of existing expenditure. Indeed, some of the investment that public authorities will have to undertake to develop applications in areas of their own responsibility will generate productivity gains and an improvement in the quality of services that should, if properly handled, lead to savings. In addition to some refocusing of expenditure on R&D, modest amounts of public money may also be useful to support awareness campaigns mainly directed at small and medium sized businesses and individual consumers. The Group recommends refocusing existing public funding more specifically to target the requirements of the information society. At the Union level, this may require some reorientation of current allocations under such headings as the Fourth Framework Programme for research and development and the Structural Funds. The same is true for expenditure at the European Union which can achieve important results by a better focusing of existing resources, including finance available under both the Fourth Framework Programme funding R&D, and under the Structural Funds. The Commission has also proposed limited support for some of the services and applications included in the Group's Action Plan from funds linked to the promotion of trans-European networks. These proposals deserve support. _________________________________________________________________ CHAPTER 6 FOLLOW-UP With this Report the Group has completed its mandate and provided recommendations for action. Our recommendations should be regarded as a coherent whole, the full benefits of which can only be reaped if action is taken in all areas. Given the urgency and importance of the tasks ahead, the Group believes that at Union level there must be one Council capable of dealing with the full range of issues associated with the information society. With this in mind, each Member States may wish to nominate a single minister to represent it in a Council of Ministers dedicated to the information society. The Commission should act similarly. The Group calls for the establishment by the Commission of a Board composed of eminent figures from all sectors concerned, including the social partners, to work on the framework for implementing the information society and to promote public awareness of its opportunities and challenges. This Board should report at regular intervals to the institutions of the Union on progress made on the implementation of the recommendations contained in this report. _________________________________________________________________ AN ACTION PLAN - SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Regulatory Framework Evolving the regulatory domain Member States should accelerate the ongoing process of liberalisation of the Telecom sector by : * opening up to competition infrastructures and services still in the monopoly area * removing non-commercial political burdens and budgetary constraints imposed on telecommunications operators * setting clear timetables and deadlines for the implementation of practical measures to achieve these goals. An authority should be established at European level whose terms of reference will require prompt attention. Interconnection and Interoperability Interconnection of networks and interoperability of services and applications should be primary Union objectives. The European standardisation process should be reviewed in order to increase its speed and responsiveness to markets. Tariffs As a matter of urgency the international, long distance and leased line tariffs should be adjusted to bring these down into line with rates practised in other advanced industrialised regions. The adjustment should be accompanied by the fair sharing of public service obligations among operators. Critical Mass Public awareness should be promoted. Particular attention should be paid to the small and medium-sized business sector, public administrations and the younger generation. Worldwide Dimension The openness of the European market should find its counterpart in markets and networks of other regions of the world. It is of paramount importance for Europe that adequate steps should be taken to guarantee equal access. Completing the agenda The Information Society is global. Union action should aim to establish a common and agreed regulatory framework for the protection of intellectual property rights, privacy and security of information in Europe and, where appropriate, internationally. IPRs Intellectual property protection must rise to the new challenges of globalisation and multimedia, and must continue to have a high priority at both European and international levels. Privacy Without the legal security of a Union-wide approach, lack of consumer confidence will certainly undermine the rapid development of the information society. Given the importance and sensitivity of the privacy issue, a fast decision from Member States is required on the Commission's proposed Directive setting out general principles of data protection. Electronic protection, legal protection and security Work at the European level on electronic and legal protection as well as security should be accelerated. Media ownership Urgent attention should be given to the question of how we can avoid divergent national legislation on media ownership undermining the internal market. Effective rules must emerge to protect pluralism and competition. Competition Competition is a key element in Europe's strategy. The application of competition rules should reflect the reality of the newly emerging global markets and the speed of change in the environment. Building blocks Networks Priority has to be given to the extension of the availability of EURO-ISDN, in line with current Commission proposals, and reductions in tariffs to foster the market. The Council should support the implementation of the European Broadband Infrastructure and secure its interconnectivity with the whole of European telecom, cable television and satellite networks. A European Broadband Steering Committee involving all relevant actors should be set up in order to develop a common vision and to monitor and facilitate the realisation of the overall concept through, in particular, demonstrations, and choice and definition of standards. With regard to mobile and satellite communications : * tariffs for mobile communications should be reduced * GSM should be promoted in Europe and internationally * a regulatory framework for satellite communications should be established * the European satellite industry should be urged to develop common priority projects and to participate actively in the development of world-wide systems. Basic services The provision and widespread use of standard trans-European basic services, including electronic mail, file transfer, video services, should be promoted by urgent and coherent action at both the European and Member State levels. The Commission should initiate the creation of a " European Basic Services Forum" to accelerate the availability of unified standards for basic services. Applications Initiatives in the application domain are the most effective means of addressing the slow take-off of demand and supply. They have a demonstration function which would help promoting their use. The Group has identified the following initiatives : * Teleworking * Distance learning * University and research networks * Telematic services for SMEs * Road traffic management * Air traffic control * Health care networks * Electronic tendering * Trans-European public administration network * City information highways. Financing The creation of the information society should be entrusted to the private sector and to the market forces. The existing public funding should be refocused more specifically to target the requirements of the information society. At the Union level, this may require some reorientation of current allocations under such headings as the Fourth Framework Programme for research and development and the Structural Funds. Follow-up Given the urgency and importance of the tasks ahead, there must be, at Union level, one Council capable of dealing with the full range of issues associated with the information society. With this in mind, each Member State may wish to nominate a single minister to represent it in a Council of Ministers dedicated to the information society. The Commission should act similarly. A Board composed of eminent figures from all sectors concerned, including the social partners, should be established by the Commission to work on the framework for implementing the information society and to promote public awareness of its opportunities and challenges. This Board should report at regular intervals to the institutions of the Union on progress made on the implementation of the recommendations contained in this Report.
Current thread:
- Rec to the EU Council Europe and the GII -- sorry for the format but .. David Farber (Jul 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Rec to the EU Council Europe and the GII -- sorry for the format but .. David Farber (Jul 09)
- Rec to the EU Council Europe and the GII -- sorry for the format but .. David Farber (Jul 09)
- Rec to the EU Council Europe and the GII -- sorry for the format but .. David Farber (Jul 09)
- Rec to the EU Council Europe and the GII -- sorry for the format but .. David Farber (Jul 09)