Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ?
From: jim () openanswers co uk
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:03:33 -0000 (GMT)
Hi, The WMF threat was and continues to be important. But Im curious to know why we didnt observe any important attack on Internet? WMF was a perfect Zero-Day attack and a scenario like the blackout of Internet was possible but nothing or no important attack! No BOT virus deployed? No DOS worm attack? All hackers become white-hat? Or they attacked and we didnt see anything? Any hypothese / explanation ?
Hi, Most of the consequences arising from exploits of this particular bug appear to have been the installation of malware. In fact it seems that most web browser vulns lately have been used for this purpose. The aim of the perpetrators may well be financial gain, from advertising revenues, compromising personal information or leasing botnets for DoS attacks. The culprits are far from being white hatted individuals. I believe that the attacks that took place were important, but this bug had big shoes to fill to live up to all the hype generated. There are no doubt many more zombies on the net as a result of this issue. Regards, Jim Halfpenny
Current thread:
- WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? pejman . gohari (Jan 09)
- Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? Jose Nazario (Jan 11)
- Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? jim (Jan 11)
- Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? Byron Sonne (Jan 11)
- Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? Chris Byrd (Jan 11)
- Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? Thierry Zoller (Jan 11)
- Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? k levinson (Jan 11)
- RE: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? Ward, Patrick James (Jan 11)