Security Incidents mailing list archives

Bad Loopback packets


From: Neil Dickey <neil () geol niu edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:09:57 -0500 (CDT)

We've been seeing what Snort calls "bad loopback traffic" in our
university network for perhaps a week and a half now, and we've
had no luck in tracking down the source much less figuring out
what is generating it.

Here's what the packets look like:

[**] [1:528:3] BAD TRAFFIC loopback traffic [**]
[Classification: Potentially Bad Traffic] [Priority: 2] 
04/21-16:17:39.669986 0:A:BB:CC:DD:EE -> 0:FF:GG:HH:II:JJ type:0x800 len:0x3C
127.0.0.1:80 -> 131.156.XX.YYY:1903 TCP TTL:125 TOS:0x0 ID:323 IpLen:20 DgmLen:40
***A*R** Seq: 0x0  Ack: 0x474A0001  Win: 0x0  TcpLen: 20
[Xref => http://rr.sans.org/firewall/egress.php]

The MAC addresses and part of the target address are obfuscated.

My sensor is located within a subnet of the university network,
and the MAC address of the "source" is that of our subnet border
router.  The packets do not, therefore, originate from within
our subnet.  Conversations with other sysops indicate that these
packets are observed more-or-less everywhere within the university
network.

The target ports vary between 1000 and 2000 exclusively, with the
lowest number I have seen being 1002 and the highest 1999.  The
source port is always 80, and the packets are always ACK-RST.  The
window size is always zero.

Traffic can be spotty.  We may see lots of these for a couple of
days, followed by none at all for most of a day, and then it will
pick up again.

Target machines include unix boxes, Macs, and PCs.  Boxes which
are most active on the network receive more of these packets than
do others.  For instance, our mail server has received 501 since
early Sunday morning, and one of our webservers 217, while a
typical PC got 15 during the same interval.  About half the
machines in our subnet have received none at all.

I don't know why loopback traffic is being allowed to pass our
internal routers; in any event I have no control over them.  It
is possible there is something here I don't understand, but it
seems to me that such traffic shouldn't be allowed out of or into
a subnet -- much less in through our border routers, if that's
where it's coming from.

I have tried Google, and what I find is other people asking the
same question, but few answers.  One such suggested that these
packets could be a sort of recon, but I don't see how:  Any
response generated by the probed box would never get back to
the source.

I would be most grateful if anyone could explain what's happening
here.

Best regards,

Neil Dickey, Ph.D.
Research Associate/Sysop
Geology Department
Northern Illinois University
DeKalb, Illinois
60115

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: