Re: Update on BIND ns_resp.c crash

[Gaby Vanhegan <gaby.vanhegan () englandagency com>]

> > I'm staying away from moving over to BIND 9 if possible.
> Out of curiosity, why?

I don't trust it.  Also, we're probably moving to tinydns.  I had to write a
server management system that handled zone files and it was a pig to make it
correctly parse zone data, even worse to make it handle special cases, and
generally a big pain in the neck.  Tinydns data files are that much easier
for a machine to work with.

I don't want to get drawn into any debate about tinydns vs BIND, I get
enough of that on the djbdns mailing list.  I simply find that tinydns is a
better fit for what I want to do with it, and I don't feel that BIND 9 is
mature enough.

Gaby

-- 
GABY VANHEGAN, Web Developer
gaby.vanhegan () englandagency com

an agency called england
marshall mill. marshall street. leeds LS11 9YJ
t.0113 234 5600 f.0113 234 5601
http://www.englandagency.com/

This e-mail contains information that is confidential and may be
Legally privileged. If  this e-mail has been addressed to you in
error and you are not the person intended or authorised to receive
it or a copy of it, please notify the sender as soon as possible. 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies 
that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats. 
Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.

To get your FREE white paper visit us at:    
http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------