Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Slapper worm "ink" instead of "cinik" (Re: slapper worm varient "cinik")
From: Jose Nazario <jose () monkey org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:33:40 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, GiulioMaria Fontana wrote:
I found in a server in my subnet some sources of that worm (.cinik.go) but I even found an .ink.go Both are script shell but they differs in the use of the name "ink" instead of "cinik" and in the address mail to which the informations are sent. What should I do with that mail address?
contact the domain contacts for that domain, ie security@ and abuse@, with the information that the email inbox is being used for malicious purposes (specifically compromise notification). ___________________________ jose nazario, ph.d. jose () monkey org http://www.monkey.org/~jose/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- Slapper worm "ink" instead of "cinik" (Re: slapper worm varient "cinik") GiulioMaria Fontana (Oct 18)
- Re: Slapper worm "ink" instead of "cinik" (Re: slapper worm varient "cinik") Jose Nazario (Oct 17)