Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Standardized Reporting
From: "Brooke, O'neil (EXP)" <o'neil.brooke () lmco com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 16:35:43 -0400
Hello, Since last night's post, I've received several responses both on and off list. Every single one of them was positive and/or supportive of the concept. So I'm going to go ahead with the idea of developing a standardized report. Right now I have a few objectives in mind for this report: + A generic report that can be used to document virtually any computer incident investigation. + Document a methodical approach to the incident investigation. (Some of the responses I've had expressed an interest in the checklist because they were not entirely aware of the sequence of events that should go into an investigation.) + Document both generic and private information, however, do this in such a way that the private information can quickly and easily be stripped from the report. If we start to use this form, it does not make sense to document in one way for the incidents list and another way for your management structure. + Operating System specific sections. We could make the form operating system independant, but then we lose a great opportunity for providing newcomers a practicle how-to investigate and incident. If anyone else has other objectives they would like a report like this to satisfy, please, either send them to me or post them to the list. O'Neil. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- RE: Standardized Reporting Rajiv Dighe (Aug 15)
- RE: Standardized Reporting H C (Aug 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Standardized Reporting Brooke, O'neil (EXP) (Aug 15)
- RE: Standardized Reporting Russell Fulton (Aug 16)
- RE: Standardized Reporting Roman Danyliw (Aug 16)
- RE: Standardized Reporting H C (Aug 16)