Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: DNS Floods to personal firewalls


From: Bryan Andersen <bryan () visi com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:00:57 -0500

I've seen lots of dns MX record requests whenever I post 
to a debian list. There are literally hundreds of requests.  
Usually on the order of 700-900 each time.  They are full 
MX record requests.  This is relatively new.  I'm wondering 
if a default configuration has changed such that MX records 
are looked up for incomming mail.  It also could be something 
else.

"Keith.Morgan" wrote:

We've been seeing these as well.  But not just to personal firewalls.  I've
seen them on cable modems, dsl lines, and corporate T-1's.

I'm cross-posting this because I've seen references to this type of activity
on multiple lists.

I'm a bit baffled by this.  The source port is always 53, with a random
destination port.  And they appear to be replies to me as well.  A
possibility is that we're being used as decoy addresses in some sort of
scanning.  However, since the addresses are *SO* random, this tends to rule
out nmap as a scanner using --randomize-hosts.  Nmap will randomize, but
when fed a really large network block to scan, it will scan within three or
so class C networks at a time.

Are there other scanning tools with the ability to use spoofed decoy
addresses, yet provide better randomization than nmap when scanning?

Keith T. Morgan
Chief of Information Security
Terradon Communications
keith.morgan () terradon com
304-755-8291 x142


-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Alexander [mailto:balexander () pmg net]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:25 AM
To: 'n9ubh () callsign net'
Cc: 'focus-linux () securityfocus com'
Subject: RE: DNS Floods to personal firewalls


I received these as well, and I know a few others that
receive them also.
Using arin whois, here is what I put together:

[140.239.176.162/17221]       HarvardNet
[165.121.70.75/64551] Earthlink
[194.205.125.26/41123]        European Regional Internet Registry
[194.213.64.150/47642]        European Regional Internet Registry
[202.139.133.129/41595]       Asia Pacific Network Information Center
[203.194.166.182/38808]       Asia Pacific Network Information Center
[203.208.128.70/12235]        Asia Pacific Network Information Center
[207.55.138.206/61929]        "Verio, Inc."
[208.184.162.71/53567]        Abovenet Communications
[209.249.97.40/45714] Abovenet Communications
[212.23.225.98/57974] European Regional Internet Registry
[212.78.160.237/29368]        European Regional Internet Registry
[216.220.39.42/21602] "Myna Communications, Inc."
[216.33.35.214/21092] Exodus Communications
[216.34.68.2/45906]   Exodus Communications
[216.35.167.58/32470] Exodus Communications
[62.23.80.2/55543]    European Regional Internet Registry
[62.26.119.34/56523]  European Regional Internet Registry
[63.209.147.246/54734]        Level 3 Communications
[64.14.200.154/32735] Exodus Communications
[64.37.200.46/65042]  Exodus Communications
[64.56.174.186/14237] Exodus Communications
[64.78.235.14/17768]  "Verado, Inc. (Firstworld Communications)"

-----Original Message-----
From: ssrat () MAILBAG COM [mailto:ssrat () MAILBAG COM]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 10:24 PM
To: FOCUS-LINUX () SECURITYFOCUS COM
Subject: DNS Floods to personal firewalls


There seems to be lots of these happening.  They appear to be some
kind of DNS replies, but are getting rejected by the
firewall - these
reports are coming from the Linux Router Project (LRP) list.

I've asked for a tcpdump to be sent, as I've not seen
these; could it
be a DNS server somewhere was taken over, or some kind of
attack tool
generates the same spoofed addresses?

So far the main report details are the reject lines from ipchains in
/var/logs/messages.

Here is a portion one person posted:

May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
208.184.162.71:34387 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0000 T=236
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
202.139.133.129:47571 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0
F=0x0000 T=241
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
203.208.128.70:16146 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0000 T=247
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
194.205.125.26:42786 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0000 T=242
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
209.249.97.40:34126 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0000 T=236
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
216.33.35.214:15928 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0000 T=237
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
140.239.176.162:11843 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0
F=0x0000 T=237
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
216.34.68.2:38839 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0000 T=237
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
207.55.138.206:24678 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0000 T=238
(#37)
May  6 14:39:57 tifa kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=6
216.35.167.58:24169 203.59.110.14:53 L=44 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0000 T=237
(#37)

He has the entire thing in an URL:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~paulhng/lrp/kernlog.txt

It also appears that the same IPs are reported over and over again.
It has the markings of some kind of tool I think - but I'm new at
this.


-- 
|  Bryan Andersen   |   bryan () visi com   |   http://www.nerdvest.com   |
| Buzzwords are like annoying little flies that deserve to be swatted. |
|   -Bryan Andersen                                                    |


Current thread: