Re: What the *** is this

["dmuz" <dmuz () angrypacket com>]

"What we have here is failure to communicate..."

I think that the issue here is the various nomenclatures that have been
given to Code Red. Here are the versions as I understand it, with names
that I have seen each called. You'll notice the discrepancies:

Code Red == Code Red I == CRvI (original)
Code Red I version 2 == Code Red II == CRv2 (no backdoor, same codebase
as first)
Code Red II == Code Red III == CRvIII (leaves the backdoors)

The first column is what I have been using. To bad this was not
standardized somehow, because it has caused a fair amount of confusion.

So I believe the article is referring to what I call Code Red II.

dmuz

----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Halligan <agent33 () geeksquad com>
To: Incidents (E-mail) <INCIDENTS () SECURITYFOCUS COM>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 11:02 AM
Subject: What the *** is this


Check this out.  Is this media nonsense, or is there really something to
it?

http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6835996.html


-Steve

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management 
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com