Honeypots mailing list archives
Re: Numberd int reqd for arpd?
From: Kyle Maxwell <krmaxwell () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:36:27 -0500
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:56:02 -0700 (PDT), Earl <unorlist () yahoo com> wrote:
Subject says it... Does arpd really require a "numbered" interface to work? With an unnumbered interface I get: arpd: bad interface configuration: not IP or Ethernet If I number it, all's well.
One would think that it would be required: without the number, there's no interface by that name. This is OS-dependent, I think, since with some Solaris tools you can specify the driver type (e.g. "hme", not necessarily "hme0" or "hme1"). But in Linux I haven't noticed a tool that worked this way. -- Kyle Maxwell krmaxwell () gmail com
Current thread:
- Numberd int reqd for arpd? Earl (Jul 29)
- Re: Numberd int reqd for arpd? Kyle Maxwell (Jul 29)
- Re: Numberd int reqd for arpd? Earl (Aug 02)
- Re: Numberd int reqd for arpd? Kyle Maxwell (Jul 29)