Honeypots mailing list archives
RE: "Honeynets" vs. "Honeypots"
From: "Andrew Hintz \(Drew\)" <drew () overt org>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:15:10 -0600
sounds right to me. (:
-----Original Message----- From: Scott - cb750c [mailto:cb750c () email com] Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 4:12 PM To: honeypots () securityfocus com Subject: "Honeynets" vs. "Honeypots" I have kind of a silly terminology question that I'd like to clear up. What differentiates a honeynet vs. a honeypot? I'm building a high-interaction GenI setup with only two machines, a firewall and a honeypot. Is this a honeynet or not? In the whitepaper I'm writing, I refer to the entire setup as a honeynet (since this setup is not part of our production network) and reserve the term honeypot for the machine which is intended to be compromised. I want to make sure I'm being accurate. Thanks, Scott
Current thread:
- "Honeynets" vs. "Honeypots" Scott - cb750c (Mar 22)
- RE: "Honeynets" vs. "Honeypots" Andrew Hintz (Drew) (Mar 22)
- Re: "Honeynets" vs. "Honeypots" Lance Spitzner (Mar 23)
- Re: "Honeynets" vs. "Honeypots" George Bakos (Mar 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Honeynets" vs. "Honeypots" HoneyNet Germany (Mar 23)