Re: More reasons not to trust electronic voting ...

[Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>]

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote:
> We don't need more reasons.  All such systems not only cannot be trusted,
> they *must not* be trusted.  Schneier did the clinching analysis eight
> years ago:
>
>         Stealing an Election
>         https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0404.html#4
>
> and the only things that have changed in the interim are (a) the
> attacker budget has dramatically increased and (b) the cost of
> the required technology has decreased.
I believe lobbyists have made more political contributions. The
contributions will likely trump all technical arguments, including
Moore's Law.

Jeff
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.