funsec mailing list archives
Re: Im lovin google spam filter
From: "Hubbard, Dan" <dhubbard () websense com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:00:44 +0000
Agreed LARGE corpuses across many are needed to make judgments. In the case of SPAM 97% is pretty easy, 98% is getting hard, 99% is minimum for enterprise. Then you start measuring into the decimals and yes its needed due to the mass volume customers get. Its not trivial to go last mile .1% at a time due to peoples judgment of what is spam and what is not. We get complaints all the time from people who have signed up for newsletters and argue they are getting SPAM'd. Our SLA FP rates are 1/300,000 and the industry is anywhere from 1/150,000 to 1/400,000 depending on their definition of an FP. -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:11 AM To: michael.blanchard () emc com Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; rsk () gsp org Subject: Re: [funsec] Im lovin google spam filter On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:49:34 EDT, michael.blanchard () emc com said:
If we take 100 people on this list, have them all look in their backyards and report if there is any paper or plastic blowing around, I'll bet we can come up with a fairly high percentage of us that don't have any paper or plastic blowing around. I'll further say that I'll bet the number would be within a standard deviation of 4% error. So, if 96% of us don't have any paper or plastic blowing around in our yards, could we safely say that no-one litters?
No, you can safely say that the population average of litter-free backyards is has a 70% chance between 92% and 100%, and about 95% chance of being between 88% and 100%. (Yes, it's likely to be closer to a chi-squared curve than a gaussian bell curve due to the constraint of one tail). The problem is that careful analysis is needed - I'll make a prediction that yards with chain link fences have a lot higher level of wind-born litter than unfenced yards. This of course impacts your analysis of litter sources. And incidentally, Rick *has* done the "take 100 people" type analysis, which is why he commented that (basically) the plural of anecdote isn't data. To report this as spam, please forward to spam () websense com. Thank you. Protected by Websense Email Security Gateway - www.websense.com Protected by Websense Hosted Email Security -- www.websense.com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Im lovin google spam filter RandallM (Apr 05)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Rich Kulawiec (Apr 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Alex Eckelberry (Apr 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Rich Kulawiec (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter michael.blanchard (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter michael.blanchard (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter michael.blanchard (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Alex Eckelberry (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Hubbard, Dan (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 07)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter rsk () gsp org (Apr 08)
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Joel Esler (Apr 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Im lovin google spam filter Alex Eckelberry (Apr 06)