Re: (perhaps ot) is a post on twitter considered speech or a published piece

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Sat, 28 May 2011 12:00:48 +0300, Gadi Evron said:
> On 5/28/11 1:14 AM, Chaim Rieger wrote:
> > what says you ?
> >
> > or if its too far ot, let it die
>
> I think it doesn't matter whether it's speech or not, as it is in fact 
> published. There should be a legal definition somewhere.

And in 20 years, there will be.  The tech field has gotten further ahead of the
legal system to a greater degree than anytime since we invented tech and a
legal system 5,000 years ago. That's why we have all these issues with
intellectual property, privacy, and similar issues.  Of course, in 20 years the
fact we have a legal framework for how to consider today's Twitter won't
matter. as both Twitter and the rest of the tech landscape will have mutated
enough that some *other* yet unseen issue will be the big thing...

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.