funsec mailing list archives
Re: too big to succeed?
From: "Discini, Sonny" <Sonny.Discini () montgomerycountymd gov>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:16:26 -0500
Common sense is not common. Is it just me or are there others who are amazed at how large agencies always try to cure the symptom instead of the root cause? -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Robert Portvliet Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 8:36 AM To: Gadi Evron Cc: funsec Subject: Re: [funsec] too big to succeed? The US government doesn't do small & efficient. Large & wasteful enriches far more connected 'contributers'.. someone's going to make a pretty penny filling all those full body scanner orders... On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:
A different look at Homeland Security, from Christopher Buckley:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-01-07/too-big-to-suc ceed/
-- Gadi Evron, ge () linuxbox org. Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- too big to succeed? Gadi Evron (Jan 08)
- Re: too big to succeed? Dave Paris (Jan 08)
- Re: too big to succeed? Robert Portvliet (Jan 08)
- Re: too big to succeed? Discini, Sonny (Jan 08)
- Re: too big to succeed? Dave Paris (Jan 08)
- Message not available
- Re: too big to succeed? Benjamin Brown (Jan 09)
- Re: too big to succeed? Discini, Sonny (Jan 08)