funsec mailing list archives

Re: too big to succeed?


From: "Discini, Sonny" <Sonny.Discini () montgomerycountymd gov>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:16:26 -0500

Common sense is not common. Is it just me or are there others who are
amazed at how large agencies always try to cure the symptom instead of
the root cause?


-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Robert Portvliet
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 8:36 AM
To: Gadi Evron
Cc: funsec
Subject: Re: [funsec] too big to succeed?

The US government doesn't do small & efficient. Large & wasteful
enriches far more connected 'contributers'.. someone's going to make a
pretty penny filling all those full body scanner orders...





On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:
A different look at Homeland Security, from Christopher Buckley:


http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-01-07/too-big-to-suc
ceed/





--
Gadi Evron,
ge () linuxbox org.

Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: