funsec mailing list archives
Re: fog of cyberwar
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:04:24 -0500
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 02:18:50AM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
On 1/23/10 11:54 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:If what they're doing was going to work, it would have worked by now.It has worked. Microsoft has made incredible efforts and their code is extremely professional. That does not mean the policy is right.
And yet their systems are compromised by the tens of thousands (or more) on a daily basis, with not the slightest sign that the trend will slow or reverse. I've begun to wonder whether the only reason still more aren't compromised is that [some] attackers/abusers already have an embarrassment of riches and just can't be bothered. I don't care about their efforts, per se. I don't care about their professional code, per se. I care about their results in the field...and their results are hideous, and continuing to get worse -- despite ever more extensive and sophisticated bandaids. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: fog of cyberwar, (continued)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Vaughn, Randal L. (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Rich Kulawiec (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Gadi Evron (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar phester (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Rich Kulawiec (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Gadi Evron (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Jason Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Dan White (Jan 24)
- Re: fog of cyberwar phester (Jan 24)
- Re: fog of cyberwar steve pirk [egrep] (Jan 24)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Rich Kulawiec (Feb 01)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Rich Kulawiec (Jan 24)