funsec mailing list archives
Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change
From: Robert Graham <robert_david_graham () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:35:16 -0800 (PST)
so long as the user understands what the point of the cert is
Users can't understand what the point of the cert is.
"if there is a padlock it is _safe_".
There shouldn't be a padlock if it's not safe (i.e. if the cert is expired or self-signed). _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- use condoms, that will insure less climate change RandallM (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Boaz Guttman Adv. (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change RandallM (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Gadi Evron (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Robert Graham (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Gadi Evron (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Larry Seltzer (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Reed Loden (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change RandallM (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Nick FitzGerald (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Robert Graham (Dec 01)
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change Boaz Guttman Adv. (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: use condoms, that will insure less climate change chaim . rieger (Dec 01)