Re: Rethinking FUNSEC

[Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>]

Barry Raveendran Greene wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> IMHO, the garbage in the press are influencing policy makers in governments
> and corporations to the wrong conclusions. Conclusions which lead to actions
> which is not addressing the reality of the threats. This is now not
> something to be laughed at, but something which is hurting the industry.
>
> I'm already started to tear into articles which as flawed, not researched,
> and garbage. I will continue to do that. 
>
> But we have another option - take the FUNSEC dialog public. This is not
> opening the list, this is taking these conversations - which deal with
> critiquing press articles -  public and searchable.
>
> Thoughts?

I think it's a great idea, if you mean making use of what's discussed 
here in a more accesible public fashion, perhaps even in official 
statements.

But as to searchable...

> _______________________________________________
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.