Re: Another security vendor spamming

[Mike Preston <mike () technomonk com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I tend to agree. I want a vendor I trust with my security to be
completely ethical in its dealings with customers. If they go as far as
spamming, who is to say what other 'shady practices' they might do?

Firewall testing? Who else gets a copy of any vulnerabilities?
Security appliances? What backdoors do they leave in?

I think the worst vendor I personally see for this is a certain spam
gateway supplier spamming me on a regular basis even though I have opted
out of their list once.

Mike Preston
Technomonk Industries

Gadi Evron wrote:
> Another security vendor spamming.
>
> Never going to get their services.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknwDm8ACgkQvhwPecbXDdwxawCfZO6LMFLU1TlwbkORN3e77FJ+
9DMAoIAuCsWOz961/sFWXOGKNkMTjCoH
=AP2O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.