funsec mailing list archives
Re: heuristics are dead?
From: Blanchard_Michael () emc com
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:55:51 -0500
oh wonderful.... Now I'm going to have to deal with all the "experts" in my office telling me that Heuristics and behavioral detection is useless and is no longer working, and might as well be shut off.... because these three fellows said it :: sigh ::: I do have to say that they do make sense in some area... I particularly agree with the Security vs Business discussion... Mike b ________________________________ From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org on behalf of Alex Eckelberry Sent: Sun 3/1/2009 6:54 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: [funsec] heuristics are dead? At the 17:45 mark, a group of security experts decries heuristics and behavioral detection, saying they are "dead". http://www.demosondemand.com/dod_security/events/topics/av.asp No, they're not. I posted a response on my blog http://tinyurl.com/c5xx3e Alex _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- heuristics are dead? Alex Eckelberry (Mar 01)
- Re: heuristics are dead? Larry Seltzer (Mar 01)
- Re: heuristics are dead? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 01)
- Re: heuristics are dead? David Harley (Mar 02)
- Re: heuristics are dead? Amrit Williams (Mar 04)
- Re: heuristics are dead? David Harley (Mar 02)
- Re: heuristics are dead? Alex Eckelberry (Mar 02)
- Re: heuristics are dead? David Harley (Mar 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: heuristics are dead? Aryeh Goretsky (home) (Mar 05)