funsec mailing list archives
Re: Bush data overwhelm
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:41:55 -0800
Why not just contract with Google? My bet is they won't charge much, if anything, to store, index, and archive the data.
-----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Alex Eckelberry Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 3:32 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: [funsec] Bush data overwhelm http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/27/washington/27archives.html?_r=1&partn
e
r=permalink&exprod=permalink The National Archives has put into effect an emergency plan to handle electronic records from the Bush White House amid growing doubts about whether its new $144 million computer system can cope with the vast quantities of digital data it will receive when President Bush leaves office on Jan. 20. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Bush data overwhelm Alex Eckelberry (Dec 27)
- Re: Bush data overwhelm Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 28)