funsec mailing list archives
Re: This is scary
From: coderman <coderman () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:52:39 -0800
On Dec 19, 2007 10:02 AM, John C. A. Bambenek, CISSP <bambenek.infosec () gmail com> wrote:
... it *is* impossible to make wireless truly available over RF. I imagine it is theoretically possible to protect against MITM and that kind of stuff, but for it to be available, especially in a combat environment, runs into some problems with the physics.
if you look at the wireless signaling transport used for nuclear weapons you see what is required for highly available wireless in a combat environment. minuscule bandwidth, excessive high power (tens of thousands of watts), and antennas literally dropped from the bottom of a plane and circled above the recipient. availability for RF transmission is a game of brute force and efficiency. if you can brute it hard enough, and tolerate bandwidth small enough, it will always be available... _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: This is scary, (continued)
- Message not available
- RE: This is scary Larry Seltzer (Dec 19)
- RE: This is scary Gadi Evron (Dec 19)
- RE: This is scary Larry Seltzer (Dec 19)
- Re: This is scary der Mouse (Dec 19)
- Re: This is scary John C. A. Bambenek, CISSP (Dec 19)
- RE: This is scary Larry Seltzer (Dec 19)
- RE: This is scary Gadi Evron (Dec 19)
- RE: This is scary Larry Seltzer (Dec 19)
- Re: This is scary scott (Dec 19)
- Re: This is scary coderman (Dec 19)
- Re: This is scary coderman (Dec 19)
- Re: This is scary Brian Loe (Dec 19)
- Re: This is scary Dude VanWinkle (Dec 19)