funsec mailing list archives
RE: Should phishing termination be only in the real of thefor-profit?
From: "Alex Eckelberry" <AlexE () sunbelt-software com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:06:41 -0500
Never mind, Matt Hines has posted a very nice note on his blog explaining what happened. All clear. ________________________________ From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Alex Eckelberry Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 11:02 AM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: [funsec] Should phishing termination be only in the real of thefor-profit? http://weblog.infoworld.com/zeroday/archives/2007/12/dont_be_a_phish.htm l <http://weblog.infoworld.com/zeroday/archives/2007/12/dont_be_a_phish.ht ml> While there have been some funny examples of people who have gone to great lengths to hoodwink phishers and other online fraudsters -- and some people have even turned the pursuit into a [full-time hobby] (link to http://www.castlecops.com/ <http://www.castlecops.com/> ), new research shows that playing games with the cyber-thieves just might not be a good idea." My response: http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/this-is-not-cool.html Alex Eckelberry
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Should phishing termination be only in the real of the for-profit? Alex Eckelberry (Dec 14)
- RE: Should phishing termination be only in the real of thefor-profit? Alex Eckelberry (Dec 14)
- Re: Should phishing termination be only in the real of the for-profit? Dude VanWinkle (Dec 14)
- RE: Should phishing termination be only in the real of the for-profit? Alex Eckelberry (Dec 14)
- RE: Should phishing termination be only in the real of thefor-profit? Avery Buffington (Dec 14)