funsec mailing list archives
Re: Latest VB 100 test results
From: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:01:58 +0000 (GMT)
When I was running S&S, we used a humungous set of files for FP testing, but I expect it's all more difficult now. I'm very surprised that Sophos failed - do they still have common owners with VB, and share the same building? On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Jeff Kell wrote:
Alex Eckelberry wrote:A total of 17 out of 32 of antivirus products failed the company's stringent VB100 test, which expects software to detect 100 percent of the commonly-circulating 'WildList' thrown at it without signalling any false positives.Would be interesting if there was a test suite specifically designed for false positives... Jeff _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Latest VB 100 test results Alex Eckelberry (Dec 05)
- RE: Latest VB 100 test results Alex Eckelberry (Dec 06)
- Re: Latest VB 100 test results Jeff Kell (Dec 06)
- Re: Latest VB 100 test results Drsolly (Dec 06)
- RE: Latest VB 100 test results Craig Schmugar (Dec 06)
- Re: Latest VB 100 test results Dude VanWinkle (Dec 10)
- Re: Latest VB 100 test results Jeff Kell (Dec 06)
- RE: Latest VB 100 test results Alex Eckelberry (Dec 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Latest VB 100 test results Daniel H. Renner (Dec 06)
- Re: Latest VB 100 test results Florian Weimer (Dec 13)