Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam

["Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg () netzero net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:

> AOL and Yahoo probably have to most incentive for reducing spam.
> Consider how much of storage their storage is dedicated to spam? 10%?
> 40%? How much of their bandwidth is used for the same? Thats a lot of
> profit to be harvested for just doing the right thing.

For what its worth, Yahoo! deployed DKIM into Yahoo! mail in
2004:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys

...and:

 http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys


- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)

wj8DBQFGl+Orq1pz9mNUZTMRAiB6AKCIYtGNwW5FI1Of8dayB6KFkcSb6wCg5K0+
AD4Y5q7YQV6oZhMKYwVfIWQ=
=VDtg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.