funsec mailing list archives
Re: *groan*
From: der Mouse <mouse () rodents montreal qc ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:45:19 -0400 (EDT)
OK, I'm thinking it's a subnet mask, and the significance of 255 is easy to figure. 240 and 252 less so, but at least they are within range. But 257?I have encountered many people who don't believe in non-contiguous subnet masks.
Believe in them?! I've *seen* them! (Actually, for a while I was using a netmask of 0xffffffd8 for my house LAN. One of the things I dislike about IPv6 is the desupport for noncontiguous netmasks - I can understand it, but I don't like it.)
To be fair, a number of OSes don't support them anymore.
Eww! My reaction, were I ever to run into that, would be the same as to any other bug in the network stack.... /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse () rodents montreal qc ca / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- *groan* Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Jeff Kell (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Blue Boar (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* der Mouse (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- Re: *groan* Blue Boar (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Nick FitzGerald (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- Re: *groan* Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Oct 27)
- Re: *groan* Dude VanWinkle (Oct 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: *groan* Krpata, Tyler (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Blue Boar (Oct 26)
- RE: *groan* Drsolly (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Dude VanWinkle (Oct 26)
- Re: *groan* Fergie (Oct 26)