funsec mailing list archives
Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:47:12 -0400
On 8/28/06, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () dione ids pl> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Dude VanWinkle wrote: > "Tipping Point customers have been protected from this flaw since x.y.z" > Is that extortion? No. Sorry.
I guess it depends on the vendor and how long they have given them to patch the issue. Still FD of 30 0-days seems odd for a security company that will profit off it. Que Sirah -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Fergie (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Dude VanWinkle (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Michal Zalewski (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Dude VanWinkle (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Matthew Murphy (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Josh Bressers (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Matthew Murphy (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Michal Zalewski (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws ric k (Aug 30)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Michal Zalewski (Aug 28)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Dude VanWinkle (Aug 29)
- Re: TippingPoint's 'Zero-Day Initiative' to Publish Unpatched Flaws Dude VanWinkle (Aug 28)