Re: [privacy] We'll likely *never* get to the bottom of this...

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On 5/23/06, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006 23:04:45 -0000, Fergie said:
> > Vote these traitors out in the next election, folks -- that's the
> > _only_ avenue we have.
>
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
>                 --Ed Howdershelt
>
> I think we're looking at needing that third box.  Of course, the biggest
> problem is that if we impeach George W. Bush (pick a reason, any reason,
> from here: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6330) - then we'd
> have Dick Cheney in power, not just pulling the strings.

Well, another problem we will have is Clinton proved that lying is not
an impeachable offence, right?

Or is it lying about a BJ is not an impeachable offence?



> Kind of reminds me of how George I, in Gulf War I, decided not to get rid
> of Saddam Hussein then - because the most likely outcome was his son Udu
> coming into power.

And look how well that turned out ;-)

-JP
_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy