Re: [privacy] Qwest Explains Rejection of NSA Requests

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On 5/15/06, Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
> Proof for what?
>
> Oh, and the impeachment had nothing to do with a blow job - it was
> about lying under oath. If you can lie under oath then the oath you
> take for office is meaningless as well. I wasn't a fan of Clinton or
> the impeachment - but once again some folks just can't help but
> mischaracterize it for their own benefit.

If Clinton had just declared his wang important to National Security,
we could have avoided a lot of meaningless conversations.

-JP





> On 5/13/06, Kevin McAleavey <kevinmca () nsclean com> wrote:
> > PROOF, please?
> >
> > That lengthy impeachment was supposed to be about all that ...
> _______________________________________________
> privacy mailing list
> privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
> http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy