funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block
From: Greg Poirier <grep () reflexsecurity com>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:19:49 -0400
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 18:13 +0000, Fergie wrote:
I suppose you're right, given that I'm not a Skype user, nor a VoIP user in any way, shape, or form. :-) But I'll bet this will: http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpfone/
I hadn't seen this. Excellent.
Of course, it won't help with traffic analysis, but that's where something like a Tor system would come in handy. :-)
By Grapthar's Hammer, I don't care about traffic analysis. I just want secure untraceable communication. Is that so much to ask?!?!?!?! (more punctuation means more emphasis) grep
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Fergie (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Greg Poirier (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Dude VanWinkle (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block daniel uriah clemens (May 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Fergie (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Greg Poirier (May 05)
- Re: [privacy] Skype 2.5 Proves Harder to Block Fergie (May 05)