funsec mailing list archives
Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"?
From: Kevin McAleavey <kevinmca () nsclean com>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:35:56 -0500
At 08:36 AM 3/8/06, Richard M. Smith wrote:
Unbelievable..... Famed "computer terrorist" teaches anti-hacking http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060308/tc_nm/hacker_dc By Rebecca Harrison (rebecca.harrison () reuters com) 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
Rupert Murdoch is a majority stockholder in Reuters, so there's your explanation - "fair and balanced." But even more interesting is Reuters' official policy on the "T-word" ... <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Taranto>James Taranto, a columnist for the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Journal>Wall Street Journal, wrote in <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opinionjournal.com&action=edit>opinionjournal.com on <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_21>September 21, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001>2001:<http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=95001205#reuter>[4] <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Jukes&action=edit>Stephen Jukes, global news editor for Reuters, the British wire service, has ordered his scribes not to use the word <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terror>terror to refer to the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11%2C_2001_attacks>Sept. 11 atrocity, the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Post>Washington Post's <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Kurtz>Howard Kurtz reports: <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14272-2001Sep23.html>[5] "We all know that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter and that Reuters upholds the principle that we do not use the word terrorist," Jukes writes in an internal memo. "To be frank, it adds little to call the attack on the World Trade Center a terrorist attack." Jukes tells Kurtz: "We're trying to treat everyone on a level playing field." <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Solomon>Norman Solomon, executive director for the <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Institute_for_Public_Accuracy&action=edit>Institute for Public Accuracy and a U.S. columnist, has been quoted as saying that there was nothing wrong with describing the September 11 attacks as terrorism if journalists were willing to use the word "with integrity across the board" - including when it applied to the foreign policy of their own country. Otherwise, he said, "the Reuters policy is the only principled journalistic alternative." <http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/words/terrorists.html>[6] Hmmmm. ---------------------------------------------------- Kevin McAleavey at your service Privacy Software Corporation http://www.nsclean.com kevinmca () nsclean com
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"? Richard M. Smith (Mar 08)
- Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"? Drsolly (Mar 08)
- Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"? Jeff Rosowski (Mar 13)
- Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"? Blue Boar (Mar 13)
- RE: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a"Computer Terrorist"? Richard M. Smith (Mar 13)
- Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a"Computer Terrorist"? Blue Boar (Mar 13)
- Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"? Gary Warner (Mar 31)
- Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"? Jeff Rosowski (Mar 13)
- Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"? Drsolly (Mar 13)
- Re: Why did Reuters call Kevin Mitnick a "Computer Terrorist"? Drsolly (Mar 08)