funsec mailing list archives
Re: U.S. Reclassifies Many Documents in Secret Review
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:20:31 -0500
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:53:33 EST, Dude VanWinkle said:
Is it national security if the current administration would be put in prison from the facts released? Such is the new age old question
More likely, the documents in question should have been classified all along, and were merely put back to their proper status. And it's hardly news - it's been a continuing saga well known over the past few years to readers of the Federation of American Scientists' Secrecy News: http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html
From a Secrecy News from Jan 15, 2002:
RECLASSIFYING DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS The question of whether documents, once declassified, can be or should be reclassified has been asked on a number of occasions over the years, and then answered in different ways. Nuclear weapons information, once declassified, cannot be reclassified, according to the Department of Energy's interpretation of Section 142 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2162). (DOE officials sometimes finagle this restriction by withholding the declassified information as Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information.) Under President Reagan, officials were permitted to reclassify declassified information and documents under certain conditions. This authority was exercised on numerous occasions, but these do not seem to have been publicly reported. See Section 1.6(c) and (d) of President Reagan's Executive Order 12356: http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo12356.htm#reclass President Clinton permitted reclassification of declassified information only if it had not been officially released to the public. Once it was officially released it could not then be reclassified. See Section 1.8(c) and (d) of President Clinton's Executive Order 12958, which remains in effect today: http://www.fas.org/sgp/clinton/eo12958.html#reclass A review of this executive order is now underway by the Bush Administration and may include consideration of expanded authority to reclassify declassified information. FAS has urged that any such reclassification authority be narrowly circumscribed and that agency proposals for reclassification actions be subject to independent approval or rejection by the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel.
From Secrecy News, Jul 10, 2002:
INADVERTENT DISCLOSURES OF CLASSIFIED INFO The Department of Energy yesterday published its latest quarterly report to Congress on classified nuclear weapons information that has been inadvertently disclosed through declassification of historical records. Out of approximately 2 million pages of publicly available declassified records that were examined between November 2001 and February 2002, DOE reviewers found 239 pages of classified information. The most common revelation was "nuclear weapon storage locations" from several decades ago, information that is normally of minimal sensitivity. Other documents contained classified data on topics such as "thermonuclear weapon design or function" and "interface between nuclear weapon and delivery system." An assessment of what damage, if any, might have resulted from the disclosures was not made available. The inadvertently disclosed records were removed from public access. See the "Sixth Report on Inadvertent Releases of Restricted Data and Formerly Restricted Data under Executive Order 12958 (Deleted Version)," dated February 2002 and released yesterday, here: http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/inadvertent6.html
From Secrecy News, Jun 6, 2003:
SECRECY OF HISTORICAL NUKE DEPOTS UNDER REVIEW The continued classification of historical U.S. nuclear weapons storage locations around the world will be reviewed by the Department of Defense and other agencies, and may be revised later this year, according to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). The secrecy of these locations, which in many cases have long since ceased to be operational, impedes the declassification of historical records and accounts for the most frequent inadvertent disclosures of nominally classified information. Historians had written to ISOO last year to urge reconsideration of this category of secrecy. In response, ISOO director J. William Leonard reported that the Departments of Defense, State and Energy would address the matter. "Without committing to any specific change, all three entities expressed a willingness to review certain aspects of this issue," he wrote in an April 2 letter to historian Priscilla McMillan: http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2003/06/isoo040203.html "I don't expect anything new on any internal DoD review until late summer at the earliest," Mr. Leonard said this week.
From Secrecy News, Dec 16, 2004:
CIA REMOVES RECORDS FROM NATIONAL ARCHIVES The Central Intelligence Agency has been unilaterally removing records from public collections in the National Archives, according to the minutes of a September 2004 meeting of the State Department Historical Advisory Committee that were approved for release this week. The Advisory Committee oversees the production of the official State Department publication Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS). A State Department official noted that "the practice of submitting an entire FRUS manuscript to the CIA [for review] had resulted in the reclassification of documents located at the National Archives...." "CIA reviewers... claimed the right to remove documents from the open files that, in their view, had never been 'properly declassified'." The meeting minutes include a number of other notable historical nuggets, such as: "The CIA History staff will soon publish [sic] a classified study on DCI John McCone." A copy of the minutes of the September 2004 meeting of the State Department Historical Advisory Committee is here: http://www.fas.org/sgp/advisory/state/hac0904.html
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- U.S. Reclassifies Many Documents in Secret Review Fergie (Feb 20)
- Re: U.S. Reclassifies Many Documents in Secret Review Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)
- Re: U.S. Reclassifies Many Documents in Secret Review Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 20)
- RE: U.S. Reclassifies Many Documents in Secret Review Gary Funck (Feb 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: U.S. Reclassifies Many Documents in Secret Review Fergie (Feb 20)
- Re: U.S. Reclassifies Many Documents in Secret Review Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)