Re: EarthLink Firmly Says 'No' to Spying Without Subpoena

["Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>]

That's a very good question.

- ferg


-- Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Fergie wrote:
> EarthLink, an Atlanta-based Internet service provider, said its firm
> policy is to not respond to surveillance requests without a subpoena or
> other court order. And one consumer advocate cheered EarthLink’s stance,
> saying it reminds communications companies they can say “no.”

Does Earthlink consider a National Security Letter to be a court order, or
a subpoena or something else?


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.