funsec mailing list archives
Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail
From: Larry/Spamhaus <lr () spamhaus org>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:59:52 +0000
At 04:07 PM 2/8/06 -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> The Goodmail people seem to think that [misinformation]'s all been > planted by their competitors (Spamhaus and the like, I suppose) Hm? Spamhaus is a Goodmail competitor?? I didn't think Spamhaus was selling any sort of service to anyone and thus could hardly be competing with someone who is. What am I missing?
Not much. But perhaps this: We proposed a TLD based "whitelist sender" system back in spring 2004. ".mail" - http://www.spamhaus.org/tld/
After two years of an ICANN process I'd not wish on my worst enemy, we heard two months ago that ICANN decided to pass. Seems they figured .asia, .jobs, .cat, .travel, etc. were worthwhile and this was not. I tend to disagree*.
We do offer a free "Goodmail type service" to email to all our users, it's quite simple in fact: Don't spam and you won't be listed. Ya don't even have to sign up! :)
Cheers, Larry @ Spamhaus * well, unless I can get my pussy.cat domain for Fluffy! Cheers, Larry @ Spamhaus _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail, (continued)
- RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re[6]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Jeff Kell (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Gary Funck (Feb 09)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry/Spamhaus (Feb 09)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Tom Van Vleck (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Dude VanWinkle (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 07)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Gary Funck (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail der Mouse (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Stephen J. Smoogen (Feb 07)