Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Responsible disclosure: terms and conditions


From: Daniel Wood <daniel.wood () owasp org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 15:40:26 -0400

Should also point out that getting E&O insurance is a good idea. 

Daniel

On Jun 8, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Dave Warren <davew () hireahit com> wrote:

On 2014-06-08 04:03, Paul Vixie wrote:
this is concerning, for two reasons.

first, for enforceability, a contract requires exchange of
consideration. what's yours? i can see that the vendor is receiving
something of value (the disclosure) but it's not clear what you're
getting in return beyond the opportunity to have your good deeds go
unpunished. absence of a negative does not amount to a positive in the
eyes of the law.

Indemnity is definitely consideration. I'm not sure that "1- You will not attempt to threaten or prosecute the 
researcher in any jurisdiction." is sufficient though, but something similar in appropriate legalese would possibly 
do the trick.

There also needs to be an enforcement or penalty clause that is mutually agreeable (and this is probably where most 
companies will start to wonder if agreeing is worthwhile). A contact without an enforcement clause is mostly useless 
since a violation will, at most, allow the opposing party to disregard the contract. This works great in a "I will 
mow your lawn as needed for $80/week" contract, in which case in the event of a breach, the other party would stop 
complying with their terms.

In this case, the vendor has on ongoing obligation to not sue, whereas the researcher has completed their portion as 
soon as they reveal the information to the company (or as soon as they complete a defined responsible disclosure 
period). If the company chooses to pursue legal action against the researcher, the researcher has no remedy in the 
contract.

At a minimum, agreeing to limit damages in the event of any and all legal actions resulting from researching and 
disclosing the vulnerability would be a start.

Still, I like the idea, especially if it's something that a reasonable number of researchers use.

-- 
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren



_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/


Current thread: