Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian
From: Lodewijk andré de la porte <l () odewijk nl>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 12:14:27 +0100
On Jan 1, 2014 12:11 PM, "coderman" <coderman () gmail com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:02 AM, <l () odewijk nl> wrote:... Since the GSM f/w controls a radio, and thus the power, it may need a FCC certification... [bad dependencies and liabilities here]alternatively, encourage a market for open hardware and firmware/software components suitable for mobile. sell SDR SoCs that pair with an open handset like a SIM. minor assembly required; less than setting clock on microwave but slightly harder than point-and-click tethered jailbreak...
I love being mentioned but that was not my statement.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian coderman (Jan 01)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Lodewijk andré de la porte (Jan 01)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian coderman (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian coderman (Jan 01)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Anonymous (Jan 06)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Bzzz (Jan 06)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Daniel Corbe (Jan 07)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Lodewijk andré de la porte (Jan 01)