Re: Why PRISM kills the cloud | Computerworld Blogs

[Justin Ferguson <jf () ownco net>]

> Freedom of speech and freedom of anonymous speech is protected by the first amendment..

There is nothing anywhere in any of US law, whether it be the bill of
rights or case law/judicial review which *modifies* those rights. More
over, you probably mean to reference the 4th amendment, not the 1st,
as having a given type of speech monitoring does not inhibit its
expression, but may/may not constitute an illegal search and seizure.

This will eventually be reviewed by SCOTUS, to which we will determine
whether its constitutional or not. That's how it works here, despite
what people yelling about knowing their rights think.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:01 AM, laurent gaffie
<laurent.gaffie () gmail com> wrote:
> Freedom of speech and freedom of anonymous speech is protected by the first
> amendment..
>
> https://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity
>
>
>
>
> 2013/6/11 Philip Whitehouse <philip () whiuk com>
> > Seems like some people spend way to much time focusing on the second
> > amendment rather than the first one...
> >
> > Well this relates mainly to the fourth amendment, not the first. The first
> > tends to get decent coverage. Publication of the leak by journalists is the
> > only under the realm of the first.
> >
> > Philip Whitehouse
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/