Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability
From: Daniel Preussker <daniel () preussker net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:02:19 +0200
can you paste it somewhere where no login is required please? Daniel Preussker [ Security Consultant, Network & Protocol Security and Cryptography [ LPI & Novell Certified Linux Engineer and Researcher [ Daniel () Preussker Net [ http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x87E736968E490AA1 On 12.08.2013, at 15:31, yuange wrote:
somebody's poc http://weibo.com/p/1005051838905715/weibo?from=page_100505_home&wvr=5.1&mod=weibomore#3610572387549394 微软呀,要怎么说你们呢。3个月的沟通不承认,一定要POC才承认,这么简单的代码看不懂吗?说得那么明白写POC真的有那么难吗?实在太磨叽了。 这个漏洞你们还感谢360吗?不是我不配合,3个月的沟通,不给POC就关闭这个漏洞的修补。顺便问一声,那几个漏洞修补还要花几个月呀? From: yuange1975 () hotmail com To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:22:18 +0000 #0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability http://t.cn/zQJYHgA .Technical challenge how to write exploit code? 漏洞报告已经说得很明白,指出问题代码,怎么定位代码。鉴于微软一次次的纠缠于需要提供POC,那就让大家来写POC吧,写好记得发一份给微软。 :) https://twitter.com/yuange75 我的观点: #antiNSA 现在APT的大环境下,POC代码、EXP利用技术都是宝贵资源,不想因为中间环节被控制或者SNIFFER而丢失这些宝贵资源,现在坚定报告漏洞不提供POC和EXP,除非有偿的漏洞报告。反汇编指出问题代码点,对于漏洞修补已经提供了足够的重要信息了,要想POC自己分析。 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability yuange (Aug 12)
- Re: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability Daniel Preussker (Aug 13)
- Re: 0day IE9/10 information disclosure vulnerability xnite (Aug 13)