Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Using second gpg keyring may be misleading?
From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor () hammerofgod com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:46:37 +0000
Ah... Very interesting. Another example where "default trust" can be a bad thing (as we saw with Flame). Sent from my iPad On Jun 15, 2012, at 6:43 AM, "Georgi Guninski" <guninski () guninski com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 05:52:26PM +0000, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:What are you considering exploitable? The untrusted/unverified "Master" key?ubuntu fixed this out of paranoia: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-security-announce/2012-June/001721.htmlWhile it appears that a man-in-the-middle attacker cannot exploit this, as a hardening measure this update adjusts apt-key to validate all subkeys when checking for key collisions.i would suppose this was exploitable while it was alive.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Using second gpg keyring may be misleading? Georgi Guninski (Jun 14)
- Re: Using second gpg keyring may be misleading? Thor (Hammer of God) (Jun 14)
- Re: Using second gpg keyring may be misleading? Georgi Guninski (Jun 15)
- Re: Using second gpg keyring may be misleading? Thor (Hammer of God) (Jun 15)
- Re: Using second gpg keyring may be misleading? Georgi Guninski (Jun 15)
- Re: Using second gpg keyring may be misleading? Thor (Hammer of God) (Jun 14)